From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755326Ab3EVHPU (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 03:15:20 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:34627 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753809Ab3EVHPS (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 03:15:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 00:14:58 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: David Miller Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dborkman@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, nschichan@freebox.fr Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree Message-Id: <20130522001458.af0f4ab5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20130522.000748.454683591881350280.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20130521142948.444f09820c5406f9adc4b7f1@canb.auug.org.au> <20130521130438.1ecdf535ab2461888abbe0c3@linux-foundation.org> <20130522.000748.454683591881350280.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 22 May 2013 00:07:48 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote: > From: Andrew Morton > Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 13:04:38 -0700 > > > Nicolas, I think the patches need a re-check so I'll drop the versions > > which I presently have. Please refresh, retest and resend when > > convenient? It'll need to be against linux-next, which is where the > > conflicting (vfree/module_free) changes have occurred. > > How about working against net-next and submitting your patches to netdev > just like the rest of the world? > Well that's probably practical. But the patchset is a seccomp enhancement for (at present) ARM. Not exactly net stuff, or anything which netdev readers are likely to spend a lot of time testing and reviewing.