On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 04:09:51PM +0200, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> > -	if (!orig_node->bcast_own_sum)
> > -		goto free_bcast_own;
> > +	spin_lock_init(&orig_node->bcast_seqno_lock);
> > +	reset_time = jiffies - 1 - msecs_to_jiffies(BATADV_RESET_PROTECTION_MS);
> > +	orig_node->bcast_seqno_reset = reset_time;
> > +	orig_node->batman_seqno_reset = reset_time;
> 
> Why are you moving this stuff around in the function? I don't see the purpose ... reset_time
> or bcast_seqno_lock are just moved, but not changed.

well, if you look some lines above you see the vlan stuff being
allocated....hence this is a rebase error :) while merging this change with tt-vlan I
introduced the error.
[...]

> >  	struct list_head vlan_list;
> >  	spinlock_t vlan_list_lock; /* protects vlan_list */
> > +	struct batadv_orig_bat_iv bat_iv;
> >  };
> 
> Same here: there are various fields which are just moved around for no obvious
> reason (bcast_seqno_lock, batman_seqno_reset, bcast_seqno_reset, last_seen, last_ttl,
> ...)

yeah sorry. as before, probably an issue triggered by a rebase.
Luckily this is just an rfc and not the final patchset :)

Thanks!



-- 
Antonio Quartulli

..each of us alone is worth nothing..
Ernesto "Che" Guevara