From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752882Ab3FFP6f (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:58:35 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:57740 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751728Ab3FFP6b (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:58:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:58:15 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Lukasz Majewski Cc: Viresh Kumar , "Rafael J. Wysocky" , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , Linux PM list , Vincent Guittot , Jonghwa Lee , Myungjoo Ham , linux-kernel , Lukasz Majewski , Andre Przywara , Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq:boost:Kconfig: Enable boost support at Kconfig Message-ID: <20130606155815.GB21272@pd.tnic> References: <1370502472-7249-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1370502472-7249-6-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1370502472-7249-6-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:07:52AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Enable/disable support for BOOST. New flag - CPU_FREQ_BOOST has been > defined for that. What's the reason for this? Why would you want to not compile-in the boosting code? Also, at least on x86, even with this feature disabled, the CPU will boost by default unless you fiddle with it through the MSRs as root. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --