From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755295Ab3FFVQf (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:16:35 -0400 Received: from ch1ehsobe006.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.181.186]:9823 "EHLO ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753594Ab3FFVQe (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:16:34 -0400 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:163.181.249.109;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:ausb3twp02.amd.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -8 X-BigFish: VPS-8(zz98dIbafdM1432I4015Izz1f42h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzzz2dh668h839h944hd25hd2bhf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1155h) X-WSS-ID: 0MNZPRD-02-3R7-02 X-M-MSG: Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 15:06:03 -0500 From: Jacob Shin To: Borislav Petkov CC: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , Andreas Herrmann , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , , Fenghua Yu , Joe Perches , Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] microcode/x86/amd: early microcode patch loading support for AMD Message-ID: <20130606200603.GA6952@jshin-Toonie> References: <1369940959-2077-1-git-send-email-jacob.shin@amd.com> <1369940959-2077-5-git-send-email-jacob.shin@amd.com> <20130531042649.GA4488@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20130531193200.GA8346@alberich> <20130531213039.GA13307@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20130601011512.GA8532@jshin-Toonie> <20130605221042.GE29856@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130605221042.GE29856@pd.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:10:42AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:15:12PM -0500, Jacob Shin wrote: > > Any thoughts on this Boris? > > Looks ok to me - I'm assuming you're testing all this new code on all > families...? Thanks, I have sent out a V2 of this patch. This time I remembered to CC you on it :-) (sorry about V1) Yes the new early load bits have been tested on variety of families, and also 32 vs 64 bits, loading on cold boot vs suspend/resume, single family container file vs multiple container files appended together, .. etc.