From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022657F54 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 01:11:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A04AC002 for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 23:11:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id p0cvdqPOAsURYxHi for ; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:11:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dave by dastard with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Ukptj-0004dd-5r for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:11:39 +1000 Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 16:11:39 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/48] xfsprogs: CRC support Message-ID: <20130607061139.GM29338@dastard> References: <1370564771-4929-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1370564771-4929-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:25:23AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Hi folks, > > This is the latest update of the series of patches tht introduces > CRC support into xfsprogs. Of note, for CRC enabled filesystems; > > - write support for xfs-db is disabled > - obfuscation for metadump is disabled > - xfs_check does nothing ("always succeed") so that xfstests > can run without needing this > - all structures shoul dbe supported for printing in xfs_db > - xfs_repair should be able to fully validate the structure > of a CRC enabled filesystem. > - xfs_repair still ignores CRC validation errors when > reading metadata > - mkfs.xfs enforces limitations on the format of CRC enabled > filesystems (inode size, attr format, projid32bit, etc). > - whenever a v5 superblock is parsed on read by any utility, > it outputs a wanring about it being an experimental > format. > > Bug reports, patches, comments, reviews, etc all welcome. I've just realised that I haven't ported any of the recent kernel fixes across to this patch set, so there will be another few patches needed for those as well... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs