From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18][V6]: PVH xen: version 6 patches... Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 06:56:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20130607135611.GF25649@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1369445137-19755-1-git-send-email-mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> <20130605152316.GE28843@phenom.dumpdata.com> <1370446562.24512.205.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20130605183420.GA15383@phenom.dumpdata.com> <1370465514.6652.13.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> <20130605150126.181da33c@mantra.us.oracle.com> <1370508414.24512.213.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1370508414.24512.213.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, tim@xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:46:54AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 15:01 -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 21:51:54 +0100 > > Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > I thought the series (up to v5 at least) was dom0 *only*, I hadn't > > > realised this had been flipped onto its head for the v6 posting. > > > > There was never a dom0 only series, initially it was both, then dom0 > > got dropped, as Jan wants a different approach. > > I was obviously confused by the conversation which was had at February's > maintainer,committer,developer call: > http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Maintainer,_Committer_and_Developer_Meeting/February_2013_Minutes > "Konrad: Should be able to do dom0 only PVH as a tech preview in > 4.3." > That was the primary goal and with the intention of squeezing it in Xen 4.3. As it is not going in 4.3, we can change the goals. > > > > > > > > [PATCH 08/18] PVH xen: tools changes to create PVH domain > > > > > > I'll try and find time to take a look, but it might have to wait until > > > after 4.3. > > > > This patch was looked at in the very early versions... So I hope nothing > > major after all this time. > > OK, thanks. > Ian. > > > > > thanks > > M- > > > >