All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] xfs: don't emit v5 superblock warnings on write
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:05:46 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130611060546.GK29376@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130530174915.GB20932@sgi.com>

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:49:15PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:39:11PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On 05/27/2013 02:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > We write the superblock every 30s or so which results in the
> > > verifier being called. Right now that results in this output
> > > every 30s:
> > > 
> > > XFS (vda): Version 5 superblock detected. This kernel has EXPERIMENTAL support enabled!
> > > Use of these features in this kernel is at your own risk!
> > > 
> > > And spamming the logs.
> > > 
> > > We don't need to check for whether we support v5 superblocks or
> > > whether there are feature bits we don't support set as these are
> > > only relevant when we first mount the filesytem. i.e. on superblock
> > > read. Hence for the write verification we can just skip all the
> > > checks (and hence verbose output) altogether.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> 
> Applied.

Ben, while I see this in the xfsdev tree, I don't see it in Linus'
tree. Did it get missed on the recent merges? If so, can you queue
it up for 3.10-rc6?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-11  6:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-27  6:38 [PATH 0/9] xfs: fixes for 3.10-rc4 Dave Chinner
2013-05-27  6:38 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: don't emit v5 superblock warnings on write Dave Chinner
2013-05-29 16:39   ` Brian Foster
2013-05-30 17:49     ` Ben Myers
2013-06-11  6:05       ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2013-06-11 21:29         ` Ben Myers
2013-05-27  6:38 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: fix incorrect remote symlink block count Dave Chinner
2013-05-29 16:39   ` Brian Foster
2013-05-30  0:46     ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-30 17:49     ` Ben Myers
2013-05-27  6:38 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: increase number of ACL entries for V5 superblocks Dave Chinner
2013-05-29 16:40   ` Brian Foster
2013-05-27  6:38 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: rework dquot CRCs Dave Chinner
2013-05-29 18:58   ` Brian Foster
2013-05-30  1:00     ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-30 12:02       ` Brian Foster
2013-06-03  4:12         ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-27  6:38 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: fix split buffer vector log recovery support Dave Chinner
2013-05-29 19:21   ` Mark Tinguely
2013-05-30 17:49     ` Ben Myers
2013-05-27  6:38 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: disable swap extents ioctl on CRC enabled filesystems Dave Chinner
2013-05-28 21:49   ` Ben Myers
2013-05-30  1:07     ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-29 21:06   ` Brian Foster
2013-05-30 17:56     ` Ben Myers
2013-05-27  6:38 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: kill suid/sgid through the truncate path Dave Chinner
2013-05-30 14:17   ` Brian Foster
2013-05-30 15:52     ` Ben Myers
2013-05-30 16:02       ` Brian Foster
2013-05-30 17:07         ` Ben Myers
2013-05-27  6:38 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: add fsgeom flag for v5 superblock support Dave Chinner
2013-05-29 15:10   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-05-29 21:43     ` Ben Myers
2013-05-29 21:47       ` Ben Myers
2013-05-30  1:28       ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-30  1:11     ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-30 14:17   ` Brian Foster
2013-05-30 17:57     ` Ben Myers
2013-05-27  6:38 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: inode unlinked list needs to recalculate the inode CRC Dave Chinner
2013-05-28 11:51   ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-28 20:36   ` [PATCH 9a,9b v2, replacements] xfs: unlinked list crcs Dave Chinner
2013-05-28 20:36     ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: fix log recovery transaction item reordering Dave Chinner
2013-05-28 20:36     ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: inode unlinked list needs to recalculate the inode CRC Dave Chinner
2013-05-30 14:17       ` Brian Foster
2013-05-30 20:27         ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-28  8:37 ` [PATCH 10/9] xfs: fix dir3 freespace block corruption Dave Chinner
2013-05-30 19:15   ` Ben Myers
2013-05-31 21:54     ` Ben Myers
2013-05-28 17:56 ` [PATH 0/9] xfs: fixes for 3.10-rc4 Ben Myers
2013-05-28 23:54   ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-29 19:01     ` Ben Myers
2013-05-29 19:27       ` Eric Sandeen
2013-05-29 19:45         ` Ben Myers
2013-05-28 21:27 ` [PATCH 11/9] xfs: fix remote attribute invalidation for a leaf Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130611060546.GK29376@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.