From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752299Ab3FQREi (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:04:38 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:50328 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751843Ab3FQREh (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:04:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:03:09 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Lorenz Haspel Cc: devel@linuxdriverproject.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, puff65537@bansheeslibrary.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, michael.banken@mathe.stud.uni-erlangen.de, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] silicom: checkpatch: assignments in if conditions Message-ID: <20130617170309.GH5008@mwanda> References: <1371486386-8043-1-git-send-email-lorenz@badgers.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1371486386-8043-1-git-send-email-lorenz@badgers.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 06:26:23PM +0200, Lorenz Haspel wrote: > Fixes checkpatch error: > There were assignments in if conditions, so I extracted them. > > Signed-off-by: Lorenz Haspel > Signed-off-by: Michael Banken Signed-off-by is a legal thing like signing a document. It could be that Michael actually signed off on these, and that's fine. Anyway, I'm curious now, why is Michael signing off on these? regards, dan carpenter