From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753020Ab3FXQlv (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:41:51 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:21405 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752687Ab3FXQlu (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:41:50 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:37:08 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Dave Jones , Steven Rostedt , "Paul E. McKenney" , Linux Kernel , Linus Torvalds , "Eric W. Biederman" , Andrey Vagin Subject: Re: frequent softlockups with 3.10rc6. Message-ID: <20130624163708.GA31664@redhat.com> References: <20130622013731.GA22918@redhat.com> <20130622173129.GA29375@redhat.com> <20130622215905.GA28238@redhat.com> <20130623143634.GA2000@redhat.com> <20130623150603.GA32313@redhat.com> <20130623160452.GA11740@redhat.com> <20130624020014.GB12811@redhat.com> <20130624143928.GA20659@redhat.com> <1372085549.18733.162.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20130624160012.GB5993@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130624160012.GB5993@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/24, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:52:29AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > check_list_nodes corruption. next->prev should be prev (ffff88023b8a1a08), but was 00ffff88023b8a1a. (next=ffff880243288001). > > > > > > Can't find "check_list_nodes" in lib/list_debug.c or elsewhere... > > > > > > > [] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b > > > > [] warn_slowpath_common+0x61/0x80 > > > > [] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50 > > > > [] rb_head_page_deactivate.isra.39+0x61/0x80 > > > > > > How? rb_list_head_clear() just modifies list->next directly. > > > > > > > hopefully despite that it'll actually function as intended. > > > > > > Yes ;) > > > > I'm curious to what happened. > > Ah, this is the first victim of my new 'check sanity of nodes during list walks' patch. > It's doing the same prev->next next->prev checking as list_add and friends. > I'm looking at getting it into shape for a 3.12 merge after some other preparatory patches > go into 3.11 So you used the patched kernel when you hit the lockups ? What else was changed? Oleg.