All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com>
To: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>
Cc: Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com,
	Jens Lehmann <jens.lehmann@web.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [submodule] Add depth to submodule update
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:02:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130626160219.GC9141@paksenarrion.iveqy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130625221132.GB4161@sandbox-ub>

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:11:32AM +0200, Heiko Voigt wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:49:25AM +0200, Fredrik Gustafsson wrote:
> > Used only when a clone is initialized. This is useful when the submodule(s)
> > are huge and you're not really interested in anything but the latest commit.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com>
> 
> I this is a valid use case. But this option only makes sense when a
> submodule is newly cloned so I am not sure whether submodule update is
> the correct place. Let me think about this a little more. Since we do
> not have any extra command that initiates the clone this is probably the
> only place we can put this option. But at the moment it does not feel
> completely right.
> 
> Apart from that the code looks good. If the user does a checkout of a
> revision that was not fetched submodule update will error out the same
> way as if someone forgot to push his submodule changes. So that should
> not be a problem.
> 

I agree and would love to say that I've a more beautiful solution, but
I haven't.

The only other solution I can think about is to add a git submodule
clone that will do only clones of non-cloned submodules.

I'm no UI expert so I don't know what's best. Maybe that's more
intuitive.

-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar
Fredrik Gustafsson

tel: 0733-608274
e-post: iveqy@iveqy.com

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-26 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-23  8:04 [RFC] [submodule] Add depth to submodule update Fredrik Gustafsson
2013-06-24 22:49 ` [PATCH] " Fredrik Gustafsson
2013-06-25  5:07   ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-25 22:11   ` Heiko Voigt
2013-06-26 16:02     ` Fredrik Gustafsson [this message]
2013-06-26 21:03       ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-27 14:54         ` Jens Lehmann
2013-06-28  6:50           ` Heiko Voigt
2013-06-28 18:44             ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-28 20:54               ` Jens Lehmann
2013-06-28 22:51                 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-28 23:07                   ` Fredrik Gustafsson
2013-06-30 19:17                     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-26 16:16     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130626160219.GC9141@paksenarrion.iveqy.com \
    --to=iveqy@iveqy.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=hvoigt@hvoigt.net \
    --cc=jens.lehmann@web.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.