From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752914Ab3F0JgZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 05:36:25 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:52108 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752037Ab3F0JgY (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 05:36:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:36:09 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , LKML , Jiri Olsa Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fixup for removing -f option in perf record Message-ID: <20130627093609.GO28407@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1372307120-737-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1372307120-737-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:25:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > From: Namhyung Kim > > The commit bf3da4014a0c ("perf record: Remove -f/--force option") got > rid of -f option from perf record. But this option was used > internally by various sub-commands so they wouldn't work anymore. > Also update the example document not to use -f option. Oh man.. we got rid of -f? Do we now default to over-write existing data file?