All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Hyunhee Kim <hyunhee.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Anton Vorontsov' <anton@enomsg.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rob@landley.net,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	rientjes@google.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
	'Kyungmin Park' <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	'Minchan Kim' <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vmpressure: consider "scanned < reclaimed" case when calculating  a pressure level.
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:37:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130627093721.GC17647@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <009601ce72fd$427eed70$c77cc850$%kim@samsung.com>

On Thu 27-06-13 15:12:10, Hyunhee Kim wrote:
> In vmpressure, the pressure level is calculated based on the ratio
> of how many pages were scanned vs. reclaimed in a given time window.
> However, there is a possibility that "scanned < reclaimed" in such a
> case, when reclaiming ends by fatal signal in shrink_inactive_list.
> So, with this patch, we just return "low" level when "scanned < reclaimed"
> happens not to have userland miss reclaim activity.

Hmm, fatal signal pending on kswapd doesn't make sense to me so it has
to be a direct reclaim path. Does it really make sense to signal LOW
when there is probably a big memory pressure and somebody is killing the
current allocator?

The THP case made sense because nr_scanned is in LRU elements units
while nr_reclaimed is in page units which are different so nr_reclaim
might be higher than nr_scanned (so nr_taken would be more approapriate
for vmpressure).
 
> Signed-off-by: Hyunhee Kim <hyunhee.kim@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmpressure.c |    8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmpressure.c b/mm/vmpressure.c
> index 736a601..8c60cad 100644
> --- a/mm/vmpressure.c
> +++ b/mm/vmpressure.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,14 @@ static enum vmpressure_levels vmpressure_calc_level(unsigned long scanned,
>  	unsigned long pressure;
>  
>  	/*
> +	 * This could happen, in such a case, when reclaiming ends by fatal
> +	 * signal in shrink_inactive_list(). In this case, return
> +	 * VMPRESSURE_LOW not to have userland miss reclaim activity.
> +	 */
> +	if (reclaimed > scanned)
> +		return VMPRESSURE_LOW;
> +
> +	/*
>  	 * We calculate the ratio (in percents) of how many pages were
>  	 * scanned vs. reclaimed in a given time frame (window). Note that
>  	 * time is in VM reclaimer's "ticks", i.e. number of pages
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-27  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-17 11:30 [PATCH v3] memcg: event control at vmpressure Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-17 13:15 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-18  6:10   ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-18  8:00     ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-18 11:01       ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-19 11:25         ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-19 11:59           ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-19 11:31         ` [PATCH v4] " Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-19 12:53           ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-20  2:13             ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-20  2:17             ` [PATCH v5] " Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-20 12:16               ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-21  0:21                 ` [PATCH v6] " Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-21  0:24                   ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-21  1:22                     ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-21  9:19                       ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-21 11:02                         ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-21 11:54                           ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-21 12:40                             ` [PATCH v7] " Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-21 16:27                         ` [PATCH v6] " Minchan Kim
2013-06-21 16:44                           ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-22  0:27                             ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-06-22  1:28                               ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-26  7:47                               ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-21 22:35                           ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-06-22  4:36                           ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-22  4:51                             ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-22  5:50                               ` [PATCH] memcg: consider "scanned < reclaimed" case when calculating Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-22  7:34                                 ` [PATCH] memcg: add interface to specify thresholds of vmpressure Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-25 20:46                                   ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-26  7:39                                   ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-26  7:50                                     ` Kyungmin Park
2013-06-26  8:03                                       ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-26  7:35                                 ` [PATCH] memcg: consider "scanned < reclaimed" case when calculating Minchan Kim
2013-06-27  6:12                                   ` [PATCH v2] vmpressure: consider "scanned < reclaimed" case when calculating a pressure level Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-27  9:37                                     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-06-27 15:35                                       ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-27 16:11                                         ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-27 18:05                                           ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-06-28 12:17                                             ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-27 23:54                                           ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-28  7:43                                             ` [PATCH v3] " Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-28 12:26                                               ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-28 12:24                                             ` [PATCH v2] " Michal Hocko
2013-06-28 13:55                                               ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-28 15:17                                                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-27 18:33                                     ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-06-26  7:34                               ` [PATCH v6] memcg: event control at vmpressure Minchan Kim
2013-06-26  7:31                             ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-25 16:07                           ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130627093721.GC17647@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anton@enomsg.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hyunhee.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.