From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752647Ab3F0Kjp (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 06:39:45 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-f182.google.com ([209.85.215.182]:51948 "EHLO mail-ea0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752299Ab3F0Kjo (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 06:39:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:39:31 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Namhyung Kim , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Paul Mackerras , Namhyung Kim , LKML , Jiri Olsa Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fixup for removing -f option in perf record Message-ID: <20130627103931.GA5534@gmail.com> References: <1372307120-737-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <20130627093609.GO28407@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130627093609.GO28407@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:25:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > From: Namhyung Kim > > > > The commit bf3da4014a0c ("perf record: Remove -f/--force option") got > > rid of -f option from perf record. But this option was used > > internally by various sub-commands so they wouldn't work anymore. > > Also update the example document not to use -f option. > > Oh man.. we got rid of -f? Do we now default to over-write existing data > file? I thought -f was the implied default for ages? Thanks, Ingo