All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Asias He <asias@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy King <acking@vmware.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Reilly Grant <grantr@vmware.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/5] VSOCK: Introduce vhost-vsock.ko
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:55:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130628065559.GB2190@hj.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130627104246.GC20215@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:42:46PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 04:00:03PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> > VM sockets vhost transport implementation. This module runs in host
> > kernel.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Asias He <asias@redhat.com>
> 
> Has any thought been given to how this affects migration?
> I don't see any API for an application to
> move to a different host and reconnect to a running
> vsock in guest.
> 
> I think we could merge without this, there are more
> pressing issues, but it's probably a requirement
> if you want this to replace e.g. serial in many
> scenarious.

I do not plan to support migration for the initial merge as well.

Reconnection is one issue needs to be addressed. Another issue is that if
the destination host is running vhost-vsock already, the port might be
used already. We probably need namesapce support.

> > ---
> >  drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 534 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/vhost/vsock.h |   4 +
> >  2 files changed, 538 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/vsock.h
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..cb54090
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,534 @@
> > +/*
> > + * vhost transport for vsock
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2013 Red Hat, Inc.
> > + * Author: Asias He <asias@redhat.com>
> > + *
> > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2.
> > + */
> > +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > +#include <net/sock.h>
> > +#include <linux/virtio_vsock.h>
> > +#include <linux/vhost.h>
> > +
> > +#include "../../../net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.h"
> 
> Send patch to move this to include/linux ?

Okay. Will cook a patch.

> > +#include "vhost.h"
> > +#include "vsock.h"
> > +
> > +#define VHOST_VSOCK_DEFAULT_HOST_CID	2;
> 
> Sure you want that ; there? This can result in strange code, e.g.
> 
> 	int a = VHOST_VSOCK_DEFAULT_HOST_CID + 1;
> 	set's a to 2.

Fixed.

> > +
> > +static int vhost_transport_socket_init(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > +				       struct vsock_sock *psk);
> > +
> > +enum {
> > +	VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES = VHOST_FEATURES,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* Used to track all the vhost_vsock instacne on the system. */
> 
> typo

Fixed.

> > +static LIST_HEAD(vhost_vsock_list);
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(vhost_vsock_mutex);
> > +
> > +struct vhost_vsock_virtqueue {
> > +	struct vhost_virtqueue vq;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct vhost_vsock {
> > +	/* Vhost device */
> > +	struct vhost_dev dev;
> > +	/* Vhost vsock virtqueue*/
> > +	struct vhost_vsock_virtqueue vqs[VSOCK_VQ_MAX];
> > +	/* Link to global vhost_vsock_list*/
> > +	struct list_head list;
> > +	/* Head for pkt from host to guest */
> > +	struct list_head send_pkt_list;
> > +	/* Work item to send pkt */
> > +	struct vhost_work send_pkt_work;
> > +	/* Guest contex id this vhost_vsock instance handles */
> > +	u32 guest_cid;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static u32 vhost_transport_get_local_cid(void)
> > +{
> > +	u32 cid = VHOST_VSOCK_DEFAULT_HOST_CID;
> > +	return cid;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> Interesting. So all hosts in fact have the same CID?

Yes. Andy commented on this already.

> > +static struct vhost_vsock *vhost_vsock_get(u32 guest_cid)
> > +{
> > +	struct vhost_vsock *vsock;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> > +	list_for_each_entry(vsock, &vhost_vsock_list, list) {
> > +		if (vsock->guest_cid == guest_cid) {
> > +			mutex_unlock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> > +			return vsock;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +	mutex_unlock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> > +
> > +	return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> > +vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
> > +			    struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> > +{
> > +	struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
> > +	unsigned out, in;
> > +	struct sock *sk;
> > +	int head, ret;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
> > +	vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
> > +	for (;;) {
> > +		if (list_empty(&vsock->send_pkt_list)) {
> > +			vhost_enable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		head = vhost_get_vq_desc(&vsock->dev, vq, vq->iov,
> > +					ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), &out, &in,
> > +					NULL, NULL);
> > +		pr_debug("%s: head = %d\n", __func__, head);
> > +		if (head < 0)
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +		if (head == vq->num) {
> > +			if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq))) {
> > +				vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
> > +				continue;
> > +			}
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		pkt = list_first_entry(&vsock->send_pkt_list,
> > +				       struct virtio_vsock_pkt, list);
> > +		list_del_init(&pkt->list);
> > +
> > +		/* FIXME: no assumption of frame layout */
> 
> Pls fix. memcpy_from_iovec is not harder.

Do we have this helper?

> > +		ret = __copy_to_user(vq->iov[0].iov_base, &pkt->hdr,
> > +				     sizeof(pkt->hdr));
> > +		if (ret) {
> > +			virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
> > +			vq_err(vq, "Faulted on copying pkt hdr\n");
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +		if (pkt->buf && pkt->len > 0) {
> > +			ret = __copy_to_user(vq->iov[1].iov_base, pkt->buf,
> > +					    pkt->len);
> > +			if (ret) {
> > +				virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
> > +				vq_err(vq, "Faulted on copying pkt buf\n");
> > +				break;
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		vhost_add_used(vq, head, pkt->len);
> > +
> > +		virtio_transport_dec_tx_pkt(pkt);
> > +
> > +		sk = sk_vsock(pkt->trans->vsk);
> > +		/* Release refcnt taken in vhost_transport_send_pkt */
> > +		sock_put(sk);
> > +
> > +		virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
> > +	}
> > +	vhost_signal(&vsock->dev, vq);
> 
> I think you should not signal if used was not updated.

Right, it is very easy to add the optimization here.

> > +	mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void vhost_transport_send_pkt_work(struct vhost_work *work)
> > +{
> > +	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
> > +	struct vhost_vsock *vsock;
> > +
> > +	vsock = container_of(work, struct vhost_vsock, send_pkt_work);
> > +	vq = &vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX].vq;
> > +
> > +	vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(vsock, vq);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +vhost_transport_send_pkt(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > +			 struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info)
> > +{
> > +	u32 src_cid, src_port, dst_cid, dst_port;
> > +	struct virtio_transport *trans;
> > +	struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
> > +	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
> > +	struct vhost_vsock *vsock;
> > +	u64 credit;
> > +
> > +	src_cid = vhost_transport_get_local_cid();
> 
> interestingly this is the only place cid
> is used. Shouldn't we validate it?

The local cid is a constant, how can we valicate it?

> > +	src_port = vsk->local_addr.svm_port;
> > +	dst_cid = vsk->remote_addr.svm_cid;
> > +	dst_port = vsk->remote_addr.svm_port;
> > +
> > +	/* Find the vhost_vsock according to guest context id  */
> > +	vsock = vhost_vsock_get(dst_cid);
> 
> Confused. There's a single socket per dst cid?

No, each guest has a cid, each guest has a struct vhost_vsock instance,
dst_cid tells us which struct vhost_vsock instance to use for this
packet.

> > +	if (!vsock)
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +	trans = vsk->trans;
> > +	vq = &vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX].vq;
> > +
> > +	if (info->type == SOCK_STREAM) {
> > +		credit = virtio_transport_get_credit(trans);
> > +		if (info->len > credit)
> > +			info->len = credit;
> 
> Is there support for non stream sockets?
> Without credits, you get all kind of nasty
> starvation issues.

We support SOCK_STREAM and SOCK_DGRAM. The credit thing is used for
SOCK_STREAM right now. I can extend it to SOCK_DGRAM as well.

> > +	}
> > +	if (info->len > VIRTIO_VSOCK_DEFAULT_RX_BUF_SIZE)
> > +		info->len = VIRTIO_VSOCK_DEFAULT_RX_BUF_SIZE;
> > +	/* Do not send zero length OP_RW pkt*/
> > +	if (info->len == 0 && info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW)
> > +		return info->len;
> > +
> > +	pkt = virtio_transport_alloc_pkt(vsk, info, info->len,
> > +					 src_cid, src_port,
> > +					 dst_cid, dst_port);
> 
> We also need global limit on amount of memory per
> socket. Even if remote is OK with getting 20G from us,
> we might not have so much kernel memory.

Yes, we need global limit. 

> > +	if (!pkt)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	pr_debug("%s:info->len= %d\n", __func__, info->len);
> > +	/* Released in vhost_transport_do_send_pkt */
> > +	sock_hold(&trans->vsk->sk);
> > +	virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(pkt);
> > +
> > +	/* queue it up in vhost work */
> > +	mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
> > +	list_add_tail(&pkt->list, &vsock->send_pkt_list);
> > +	vhost_work_queue(&vsock->dev, &vsock->send_pkt_work);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> > +
> > +	return info->len;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct virtio_transport_pkt_ops vhost_ops = {
> > +	.send_pkt = vhost_transport_send_pkt,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct virtio_vsock_pkt *
> > +vhost_vsock_alloc_pkt(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> > +{
> > +	struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
> > +	int ret;
> > +	int len;
> > +
> > +	pkt = kzalloc(sizeof(*pkt), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!pkt)
> > +		return NULL;
> > +
> > +	len = sizeof(pkt->hdr);
> > +	if (unlikely(vq->iov[0].iov_len != len)) {
> > +		vq_err(vq, "Expecting pkt->hdr = %d, got %zu bytes\n",
> > +		       len, vq->iov[0].iov_len);
> > +		kfree(pkt);
> > +		return NULL;
> > +	}
> > +	ret = __copy_from_user(&pkt->hdr, vq->iov[0].iov_base, len);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		vq_err(vq, "Faulted on virtio_vsock_hdr\n");
> > +		kfree(pkt);
> > +		return NULL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	pkt->len = pkt->hdr.len;
> > +	pkt->off = 0;
> > +
> > +	/* No payload */
> > +	if (!pkt->len)
> > +		return pkt;
> > +
> > +	/* The pkt is too big */
> > +	if (pkt->len > VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE) {
> > +		kfree(pkt);
> > +		return NULL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	pkt->buf = kmalloc(pkt->len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!pkt->buf) {
> > +		kfree(pkt);
> > +		return NULL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = __copy_from_user(pkt->buf, vq->iov[1].iov_base, pkt->len);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		vq_err(vq, "Faulted on virtio_vsock_hdr\n");
> > +		virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return pkt;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void vhost_vsock_handle_ctl_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
> > +{
> > +	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = container_of(work, struct vhost_virtqueue,
> > +						  poll.work);
> > +	struct vhost_vsock *vsock = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_vsock,
> > +						 dev);
> > +
> > +	pr_debug("%s vq=%p, vsock=%p\n", __func__, vq, vsock);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
> > +{
> > +	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = container_of(work, struct vhost_virtqueue,
> > +						  poll.work);
> > +	struct vhost_vsock *vsock = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_vsock,
> > +						 dev);
> > +	struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
> > +	int head, out, in;
> > +	u32 len;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
> > +	vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
> > +	for (;;) {
> > +		head = vhost_get_vq_desc(&vsock->dev, vq, vq->iov,
> > +					ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), &out, &in,
> > +					NULL, NULL);
> > +		if (head < 0)
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +		if (head == vq->num) {
> > +			if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq))) {
> > +				vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
> > +				continue;
> > +			}
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		pkt = vhost_vsock_alloc_pkt(vq);
> > +		if (!pkt) {
> > +			vq_err(vq, "Faulted on pkt\n");
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		len = pkt->len;
> > +		virtio_transport_recv_pkt(pkt);
> > +		vhost_add_used(vq, head, len);
> > +	}
> > +	vhost_signal(&vsock->dev, vq);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void vhost_vsock_handle_rx_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
> > +{
> > +	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = container_of(work, struct vhost_virtqueue,
> > +						poll.work);
> > +	struct vhost_vsock *vsock = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_vsock,
> > +						 dev);
> > +
> > +	vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(vsock, vq);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int vhost_vsock_dev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > +{
> > +	struct vhost_virtqueue **vqs;
> > +	struct vhost_vsock *vsock;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	vsock = kzalloc(sizeof(*vsock), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!vsock)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	pr_debug("%s:vsock=%p\n", __func__, vsock);
> > +
> > +	vqs = kmalloc(VSOCK_VQ_MAX * sizeof(*vqs), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!vqs) {
> > +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +		goto out;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	vqs[VSOCK_VQ_CTRL] = &vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_CTRL].vq;
> > +	vqs[VSOCK_VQ_TX] = &vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_TX].vq;
> > +	vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX] = &vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX].vq;
> > +	vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_CTRL].vq.handle_kick = vhost_vsock_handle_ctl_kick;
> > +	vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_TX].vq.handle_kick = vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick;
> > +	vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX].vq.handle_kick = vhost_vsock_handle_rx_kick;
> > +
> > +	ret = vhost_dev_init(&vsock->dev, vqs, VSOCK_VQ_MAX);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		goto out_vqs;
> > +
> > +	file->private_data = vsock;
> > +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vsock->send_pkt_list);
> > +	vhost_work_init(&vsock->send_pkt_work, vhost_transport_send_pkt_work);
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> > +	list_add_tail(&vsock->list, &vhost_vsock_list);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> > +	return ret;
> > +
> > +out_vqs:
> > +	kfree(vqs);
> > +out:
> > +	kfree(vsock);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void vhost_vsock_flush(struct vhost_vsock *vsock)
> > +{
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < VSOCK_VQ_MAX; i++)
> > +		vhost_poll_flush(&vsock->vqs[i].vq.poll);
> > +	vhost_work_flush(&vsock->dev, &vsock->send_pkt_work);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int vhost_vsock_dev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > +{
> > +	struct vhost_vsock *vsock = file->private_data;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> > +	list_del(&vsock->list);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> > +
> > +	vhost_dev_stop(&vsock->dev);
> > +	vhost_vsock_flush(vsock);
> > +	vhost_dev_cleanup(&vsock->dev, false);
> > +	kfree(vsock->dev.vqs);
> > +	kfree(vsock);
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int vhost_vsock_set_cid(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, u32 guest_cid)
> > +{
> > +	mutex_lock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> > +	vsock->guest_cid = guest_cid;
> > +	pr_debug("%s:guest_cid=%d\n", __func__, guest_cid);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&vhost_vsock_mutex);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static long vhost_vsock_dev_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int ioctl,
> > +				  unsigned long arg)
> > +{
> > +	struct vhost_vsock *vsock = f->private_data;
> > +	void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
> > +	u64 __user *featurep = argp;
> > +	u32 __user *cidp = argp;
> > +	u32 guest_cid;
> > +	u64 features;
> > +	int r;
> > +
> > +	switch (ioctl) {
> > +	case VHOST_VSOCK_SET_GUEST_CID:
> > +		if (get_user(guest_cid, cidp))
> > +			return -EFAULT;
> > +		return vhost_vsock_set_cid(vsock, guest_cid);
> > +	case VHOST_GET_FEATURES:
> > +		features = VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES;
> > +		if (copy_to_user(featurep, &features, sizeof(features)))
> > +			return -EFAULT;
> > +		return 0;
> > +	case VHOST_SET_FEATURES:
> > +		if (copy_from_user(&features, featurep, sizeof(features)))
> > +			return -EFAULT;
> > +		return 0;
> > +	default:
> > +		mutex_lock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
> > +		r = vhost_dev_ioctl(&vsock->dev, ioctl, argp);
> > +		if (r == -ENOIOCTLCMD)
> > +			r = vhost_vring_ioctl(&vsock->dev, ioctl, argp);
> > +		else
> > +			vhost_vsock_flush(vsock);
> > +		mutex_unlock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
> > +		return r;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct file_operations vhost_vsock_fops = {
> > +	.owner          = THIS_MODULE,
> > +	.open           = vhost_vsock_dev_open,
> > +	.release        = vhost_vsock_dev_release,
> > +	.llseek		= noop_llseek,
> > +	.unlocked_ioctl = vhost_vsock_dev_ioctl,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct miscdevice vhost_vsock_misc = {
> > +	.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
> > +	.name = "vhost-vsock",
> > +	.fops = &vhost_vsock_fops,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int
> > +vhost_transport_socket_init(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
> > +{
> > +	struct virtio_transport *trans;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = virtio_transport_do_socket_init(vsk, psk);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	trans = vsk->trans;
> > +	trans->ops = &vhost_ops;
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct vsock_transport vhost_transport = {
> > +	.get_local_cid            = vhost_transport_get_local_cid,
> > +
> > +	.init                     = vhost_transport_socket_init,
> > +	.destruct                 = virtio_transport_destruct,
> > +	.release                  = virtio_transport_release,
> > +	.connect                  = virtio_transport_connect,
> > +	.shutdown                 = virtio_transport_shutdown,
> > +
> > +	.dgram_enqueue            = virtio_transport_dgram_enqueue,
> > +	.dgram_dequeue            = virtio_transport_dgram_dequeue,
> > +	.dgram_bind               = virtio_transport_dgram_bind,
> > +	.dgram_allow              = virtio_transport_dgram_allow,
> > +
> > +	.stream_enqueue           = virtio_transport_stream_enqueue,
> > +	.stream_dequeue           = virtio_transport_stream_dequeue,
> > +	.stream_has_data          = virtio_transport_stream_has_data,
> > +	.stream_has_space         = virtio_transport_stream_has_space,
> > +	.stream_rcvhiwat          = virtio_transport_stream_rcvhiwat,
> > +	.stream_is_active         = virtio_transport_stream_is_active,
> > +	.stream_allow             = virtio_transport_stream_allow,
> > +
> > +	.notify_poll_in           = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in,
> > +	.notify_poll_out          = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out,
> > +	.notify_recv_init         = virtio_transport_notify_recv_init,
> > +	.notify_recv_pre_block    = virtio_transport_notify_recv_pre_block,
> > +	.notify_recv_pre_dequeue  = virtio_transport_notify_recv_pre_dequeue,
> > +	.notify_recv_post_dequeue = virtio_transport_notify_recv_post_dequeue,
> > +	.notify_send_init         = virtio_transport_notify_send_init,
> > +	.notify_send_pre_block    = virtio_transport_notify_send_pre_block,
> > +	.notify_send_pre_enqueue  = virtio_transport_notify_send_pre_enqueue,
> > +	.notify_send_post_enqueue = virtio_transport_notify_send_post_enqueue,
> > +
> > +	.set_buffer_size          = virtio_transport_set_buffer_size,
> > +	.set_min_buffer_size      = virtio_transport_set_min_buffer_size,
> > +	.set_max_buffer_size      = virtio_transport_set_max_buffer_size,
> > +	.get_buffer_size          = virtio_transport_get_buffer_size,
> > +	.get_min_buffer_size      = virtio_transport_get_min_buffer_size,
> > +	.get_max_buffer_size      = virtio_transport_get_max_buffer_size,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int __init vhost_vsock_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = vsock_core_init(&vhost_transport);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +	return misc_register(&vhost_vsock_misc);
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void __exit vhost_vsock_exit(void)
> > +{
> > +	misc_deregister(&vhost_vsock_misc);
> > +	vsock_core_exit();
> > +};
> > +
> > +module_init(vhost_vsock_init);
> > +module_exit(vhost_vsock_exit);
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Asias He");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("vhost transport for vsock ");
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.h b/drivers/vhost/vsock.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..0ddb107
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> > +#ifndef VHOST_VSOCK_H
> > +#define VHOST_VSOCK_H
> > +#define VHOST_VSOCK_SET_GUEST_CID _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x60, __u32)
> 
> No SET without GET please.

But the GET is useless here. We know the guest cid in userspace already.

> > +#endif
> > -- 
> > 1.8.1.4

-- 
Asias

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-28  6:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-27  7:59 [RFC 0/5] Introduce VM Sockets virtio transport Asias He
2013-06-27  8:00 ` [RFC 1/5] VSOCK: Introduce vsock_find_unbound_socket and vsock_bind_dgram_generic Asias He
2013-06-27  8:00 ` [RFC 2/5] VSOCK: Introduce virtio-vsock-common.ko Asias He
2013-06-27 10:34   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-28  6:28     ` Asias He
2013-06-29  4:32   ` David Miller
2013-06-29 23:45     ` Asias He
2013-06-29  4:32   ` David Miller
2013-06-27  8:00 ` [RFC 3/5] VSOCK: Introduce virtio-vsock.ko Asias He
2013-06-27  8:00 ` [RFC 4/5] VSOCK: Introduce vhost-vsock.ko Asias He
2013-06-27 10:42   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-28  2:38     ` Andy King
2013-06-28  2:38     ` Andy King
2013-06-28  6:55     ` Asias He [this message]
2013-06-27  8:00 ` [RFC 5/5] VSOCK: Add Makefile and Kconfig Asias He
2013-06-27 10:23 ` [RFC 0/5] Introduce VM Sockets virtio transport Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-28  2:25   ` Andy King
2013-06-28  5:50     ` Asias He
2013-06-28  6:12   ` Asias He
2013-06-27 19:03 ` Sasha Levin
2013-06-28  6:26   ` Asias He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130628065559.GB2190@hj.localdomain \
    --to=asias@redhat.com \
    --cc=acking@vmware.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dtor@vmware.com \
    --cc=grantr@vmware.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.