On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 06:56:47PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Much as I prefer en_GB spelling, we need to be consistent with the other > package names in this recipe. Thanks to Trevor Woerner for pointing this > out. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton > --- > meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_git.bb | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_git.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_git.bb > index f586321..81795f2 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_git.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_git.bb > @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-ralink ${PN}-sd8686 ${PN}-wl12xx ${PN}-vt6656 \ > ${PN}-rtl-license ${PN}-rtl8192cu ${PN}-rtl8192ce ${PN}-rtl8192su \ > ${PN}-broadcom-license ${PN}-bcm4329 ${PN}-bcm4330 ${PN}-bcm4334 \ > ${PN}-atheros-license ${PN}-ar9170 ${PN}-ar3k ${PN}-ath6k ${PN}-ath9k \ > - ${PN}-iwlwifi-licence ${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2a-5 ${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2b-6" > + ${PN}-iwlwifi-license ${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2a-5 ${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2b-6" > > FILES_${PN}-atheros-license = "/lib/firmware/LICENCE.atheros_firmware" > > @@ -170,10 +170,10 @@ RDEPENDS_${PN}-bcm4334 += "${PN}-broadcom-license" > ALTERNATIVE_linux-firmware-bcm4334 = "brcmfmac-sdio.bin" > ALTERNATIVE_TARGET_linux-firmware-bcm4334[brcmfmac-sdio.bin] = "/lib/firmware/brcm/brcmfmac4334.bin" > > -RDEPENDS_${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2a-5 = "${PN}-iwlwifi-licence" > -RDEPENDS_${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2b-6 = "${PN}-iwlwifi-licence" > +RDEPENDS_${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2a-5 = "${PN}-iwlwifi-license" > +RDEPENDS_${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2b-6 = "${PN}-iwlwifi-license" > > -FILES_${PN}-iwlwifi-licence = "/lib/firmware/LICENCE.iwlwifi_firmware" > +FILES_${PN}-iwlwifi-license = "/lib/firmware/LICENCE.iwlwifi_firmware" > FILES_${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2a-5 = "/lib/firmware/iwlwifi-6000g2a-5.ucode" > FILES_${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2b-6 = "/lib/firmware/iwlwifi-6000g2b-6.ucode" FWIW there is also -lic suffix in license.bbclass: LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE ??= "0" LICENSE_PACKAGE_SUFFIX ??= "-lic" I don't know if it would cause some collision between package created here and automatically by license.bbclass, but I guess not as the later creates only ${PN}-lic. -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com