From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] tracing/kprobes/uprobes: Fix race between opening probe event files and deleting probe
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 23:33:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130704033347.807661713@goodmis.org> (raw)
Currently there exists a race with deleting a kprobe or uprobe and
a user opening the probe event file or using perf events.
The problem stems from not being able to take the probe_lock from the
unregister code because we may have the event_mutex at the time, and
the event mutex may be taken with the probe_lock held.
To solve this, the events get a ref count (using the flags field), where
when an event file is opened, the ftrace_event_call ref count increments.
Then this is checked under event_mutex and if set, the unregistering
of the probe will fail.
Here's a test that shows how things break:
# cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
# echo 'p:sigprocmask sigprocmask' > kprobe_events || exit -1
# enable_probe() {
sleep 10
echo 1
}
# file=events/kprobes/sigprocmask/enable
# enable_probe > $file &
> kprobe_events
The above will corrupt the kprobe system, as the write to the enable
file will happen after the kprobe was deleted.
Trying to create the probe again fails:
# echo 'p:sigprocmask sigprocmask' > kprobe_events
# cat kprobe_events
p:kprobes/sigprocmask sigprocmask
# ls events/kprobes/
enable filter
After applying these patches, the "> kprobe_events" fails due to the
event being busy.
Masami, please review these patches and give your ack.
Srikar, can you please review the last patch. I didn't test uprobes
with this. I'll do that after the 4th.
Thanks,
-- Steve
Oleg Nesterov (1):
tracing: trace_remove_event_call() should fail if call/file is in use
Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) (3):
tracing: Add ref count to ftrace_event_call
tracing/kprobes: Fail to unregister if probe event files are open
tracing/uprobes: Fail to unregister if probe event files are open
----
include/linux/ftrace_event.h | 8 +++-
kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 21 +++++---
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 48 ++++++++++++++-----
4 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2013-07-04 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-04 3:33 Steven Rostedt [this message]
2013-07-04 3:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] tracing: Add ref count to ftrace_event_call Steven Rostedt
2013-07-04 4:22 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-04 11:55 ` [RFC PATCH] tracing: Atomically get refcounts of event_call and trace_array Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-04 12:12 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-04 12:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-05 0:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-05 2:32 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-09 7:55 ` [RFC PATCH V2] tracing: Check f_dentry before accessing event_file/call in inode->i_private Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-15 18:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-17 2:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-17 14:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-18 2:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-18 14:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-19 5:21 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-19 13:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-22 9:57 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-22 17:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-23 21:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-04 3:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] tracing: trace_remove_event_call() should fail if call/file is in use Steven Rostedt
2013-07-04 12:48 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-04 3:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] tracing/kprobes: Fail to unregister if probe event files are open Steven Rostedt
2013-07-04 12:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-04 18:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-05 2:53 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-05 17:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-08 2:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-08 14:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-09 8:01 ` [RFC PATCH] tracing/kprobe: Wait for disabling all running kprobe handlers Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-09 8:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-09 8:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-09 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-09 8:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-09 9:35 ` [RFC PATCH V2] " Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-15 18:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-18 12:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-18 14:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-30 8:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] tracing/kprobes: Fail to unregister if probe event files are open Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-31 19:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-31 20:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-31 22:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-01 2:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-01 2:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-01 3:48 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-08-01 13:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-01 13:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-01 14:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-01 14:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-01 14:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-01 14:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-02 4:57 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-08-01 13:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-04 3:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] tracing/uprobes: " Steven Rostedt
2013-08-01 3:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-01 14:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-01 14:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-04 4:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] tracing/kprobes/uprobes: Fix race between opening probe event files and deleting probe Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-04 6:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-12 13:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-12 17:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-15 18:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-16 16:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-16 19:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-16 19:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-16 19:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-17 16:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-17 17:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130704033347.807661713@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.