Sorry to be a pain in the arse at this late stage of the patch, but
I've only just noticed.

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 04:30:15PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
>  static char *size_strs[] = { "", "KB", "MB", "GB", "TB",
> -			    "PB", "EB", "ZB", "YB"};
> -char *pretty_sizes(u64 size)
> +			    "PB", "EB"};

   These are SI (power of 10) prefixes...

> +void pretty_size_snprintf(u64 size, char *str, size_t str_bytes)
>  {
>  	int num_divs = 0;
> -        int pretty_len = 16;
>  	float fraction;
> -	char *pretty;
> +
> +	if (str_bytes == 0)
> +		return;
>  
>  	if( size < 1024 ){
>  		fraction = size;
> @@ -1172,13 +1173,13 @@ char *pretty_sizes(u64 size)
>  			num_divs ++;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (num_divs >= ARRAY_SIZE(size_strs))
> -			return NULL;
> +		if (num_divs >= ARRAY_SIZE(size_strs)) {
> +			str[0] = '\0';
> +			return;
> +		}
>  		fraction = (float)last_size / 1024;

   ... and this is working in IEC (power of 2) units.

   Can we fix this discrepancy, please? Also note that SI uses k for
10^3, but IEC uses K for 2^10. Just insert an "i" in the middle of
each element of size_strs should deal with the problem.

   Hugo.

-- 
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
  PGP key: 65E74AC0 from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
   --- Charting the inexorable advance of Western syphilisation... ---