From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F0E6AE9E for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:12:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.41]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r6BGCTPY026887 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:12:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e6410-2 (172.25.40.227) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:12:28 -0700 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:12:23 -0500 From: Peter Seebach To: Chunrong Guo Message-ID: <20130711111223.06985e9f@e6410-2> In-Reply-To: <1373529521-31010-1-git-send-email-B40290@freescale.com> References: <1373529521-31010-1-git-send-email-B40290@freescale.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pseudo: pseudo-native breaks native builds for symver.patch X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:12:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:58:41 +0800 Chunrong Guo wrote: > *symver.patch causes failure if the host glibc does not provide the glibc-2.0 version of the symbol. I don't think we should take this out unconditionally, because it was added to address a (different) problem -- we were ending up with the pseudo-native libraries being used with host glibc that might be too old, and not have newer versions. I was under the impression that glibc tried to maintain binary compatibility a fairly long way back; which hosts are omitting this symbol? What architecture are you on? -s -- Listen, get this. Nobody with a good compiler needs to be justified.