All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Linus-next stats (Was: Linux 3.11-rc1)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:03:30 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130715120330.21e2a09099bf009db580ab9e@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyfTJKRnsFHGxQ+-2+GVstMUj6t4f0q5-8wJMbN-Y93+g@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4792 bytes --]

On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 16:57:23 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> This merge window was smaller in terms of number of commits than the
> 3.10 merge window, but we actually have more new lines. Most of that
> seems to be in staging - a full third of all changes by line-count is
> staging, and merging in Lustre is the bulk of that. Let's see how that
> all turns out, I have to say that we don't have a great track record
> on merging filesystems through staging.
> 
> Ignoring the lustre merge, I think this really was a somewhat calmer
> merge window. We had a few trees with problems, and we have an
> on-going debate about stable patches that was triggered largely thanks
> to this merge window, so now we'll have something to discuss for the
> kernel summit. But on the whole, I suspect we might be starting to see
> the traditional summer slump (Australia notwithstanding).

As usual, the executive friendly graph is at
http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html :-)

(No merge commits counted, next-20130701 was the linux-next based on v3.10)

Commits in v3.11-rc1 (relative to v3.10): 9494
Commits in next-20130701:		  8929
Commits with the same SHA1:		  7670
Commits with the same patch_id:		   759	(1)
Commits with the same subject line:	    55	(1)

(1) not counting those in the lines above.

So commits in -rc1 that were "in" next-20130701:	8484	89.4%
			(essentially unchanged from 89.3% last time)
Commits in -rc1 that were not in next-20120722:		1010	10.6%

Pretty good, but it would be still nice to figure out where the last lot
came from.  I have the "git log --oneline --no-walk" list if someone
wants them.

Some breakdown of that list:

Top ten first word of commit summary:

     80 btrfs
     41 arm
     35 [scsi]
     32 net
     28 drm/exynos
     25 perf
     25 drm/radeon/dpm
     19 vxlan
     17 input
     16 tracing

Top ten authors:

     56 Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
     36 Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
     27 Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
     24 Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
     16 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
     16 Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
     13 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
     12 Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
     12 Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
     10 Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>

Top ten commiters:

    130 David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
     81 Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
     68 Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
     64 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
     39 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
     37 Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
     35 James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
     24 Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
     23 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
     23 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

Quite a few of these could be bug fixes (especially DaveM's).

There are also 444 commits in next-20130701 that didn't make it into v3.11-rc1.

Top twelve first word of commit summary:

     66 arm
     37 mtd
     31 drm/i915
     11 rsxx
     10 ocfs2
      9 xen-blkback
      8 selinux
      7 kdb
      6 drbd
      6 cris
      6 clocksource
      6 acpi

Top ten authors:

     43 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
     28 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
     19 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
     18 Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
     15 Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
     12 Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
     12 Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
     11 Philip J Kelleher <pjk1939@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
     10 Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
     10 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Some of Andrew's patches are fixes for other patches in his tree (and
have been merged into those).  Paul's patches are the __cpuinit removal
series that should be applied right after -rc1.

Top ten commiters:

    184 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
     39 Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
     36 Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
     31 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
     18 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
     17 Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
     17 Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
     14 Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
     14 Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
     11 Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
 
Well, that's embarrasing :-)  Those commits by me are from the quilt
series (including Andrew's mmotm tree).

Some of the above will have been merged into other patches or replaced, I
guess.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-15  2:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-14 23:57 Linux 3.11-rc1 Linus Torvalds
2013-07-15  2:03 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2013-07-15 16:49 ` ahci_host_activate NULL pointer (was Re: Linux 3.11-rc1) Alex Williamson
2013-07-15 17:38   ` Alex Williamson
     [not found]     ` <CAJn8CcGWzvL67sBeZJVCM-xfibSTyAPPD2+0hf=qGqoz0CW-Kw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-07-15 19:23       ` Alex Williamson
2013-07-15 19:44         ` Alex Williamson
2013-07-15 21:24           ` Xiaotian Feng
2013-07-16  1:02           ` Xiaotian Feng
2013-07-16  2:29             ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130715120330.21e2a09099bf009db580ab9e@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.