From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert ARIBAUD Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:10:03 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mx6qsabrelite: Remove mx6qsabrelite code in favor of nitrogen6x In-Reply-To: <51E6500D.2090909@denx.de> References: <1373909368-10406-1-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@freescale.com> <20130717094213.6913b08e@lilith> <51E6500D.2090909@denx.de> Message-ID: <20130717111003.4357fb83@lilith> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Stefano, On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:04:29 +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On 17/07/2013 09:42, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Hi Fabio, > > > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:29:28 -0300, Fabio Estevam > > wrote: > > > >> mx6qsabrelite and nitrogen6q boards are hardware compatible, so let's avoid the > >> code duplication and only use the nitrogen6x source code to make board code > >> maintainance easier. > >> > >> Tested booting a mainline device tree kernel on a mx6qsabrelite board. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > >> --- > > > > Hmm, why does this patch not show on Patchwork? Only its V1 does. > > > > I am struggling for finding it, too. I have already seen a similar case > in the past. Otavio remarked that when there is a rename, patchwork is > not able to track it (bug in patchwork). Since we have a clear example (and on the patchwork site where the patchwork folks can dig as deep as they need), we could bring this up to the patchwork list, with the M-IDs of the V1 and V2 patches. I'd rather someone with a handle to the U-Boot mailing list do it, as it may require digging there too. Wolfgang? > Stefano Amicalement, -- Albert.