From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932300Ab3GYSD3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:03:29 -0400 Received: from s16502780.onlinehome-server.info ([87.106.93.118]:61694 "EHLO fireflyinternet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932179Ab3GYSDJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:03:09 -0400 X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=78.156.73.22; Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 19:03:01 +0100 From: Chris Wilson To: Sedat Dilek Cc: Daniel Vetter , Jani Nikula , Stephen Rothwell , intel-gfx , Linux Kernel Mailing List , DRI , linux-next Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 [ call-trace: drm | drm-intel related? ] Message-ID: <20130725180301.GB11514@cantiga.alporthouse.com> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Wilson , Sedat Dilek , Daniel Vetter , Jani Nikula , Stephen Rothwell , intel-gfx , Linux Kernel Mailing List , DRI , linux-next References: <20130725163150.GD6493@cantiga.alporthouse.com> <20130725170144.GE6493@cantiga.alporthouse.com> <20130725172616.GA11514@cantiga.alporthouse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Originating-IP: 78.156.73.22 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 07:52:22PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 07:15:03PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > >> > Basically boils down to either an object allocation failure or mmaping > >> > failure. I think dmesg with drm.debug=7 is the next step. > >> > >> Attached! Thanks for taking care. > > > > Hmm, looks like i915_gem_map_gtt fails, but no reason given, so can you > > please apply this for more debug: > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > > index 0563661..34e09bf 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > > @@ -1630,24 +1630,29 @@ i915_gem_mmap_gtt(struct drm_file *file, > > > > obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(dev, file, handle)); > > if (&obj->base == NULL) { > > + DRM_DRIVER_DEBUG("Unknown object handle %d\n", handle); > > ret = -ENOENT; > > goto unlock; > > } > > > > if (obj->base.size > dev_priv->gtt.mappable_end) { > > + DRM_DRIVER_DEBUG("Object (%d) larger than mappable aperture (%d) > %d\n", > > + (int)obj->base.size, (int)dev_priv->gtt.mappable_end); > > ret = -E2BIG; > > goto out; > > } > > > > if (obj->madv != I915_MADV_WILLNEED) { > > - DRM_ERROR("Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer\n"); > > + DRM_DRIVER_DEBUG("Attempting to mmap a purgeable buffer\n"); > > ret = -EINVAL; > > goto out; > > } > > > > ret = i915_gem_object_create_mmap_offset(obj); > > - if (ret) > > + if (ret) { > > + DRM_DRIVER_DEBUG("Failed to allocate mmap offset (ret=%d)\n", ret); > > goto out; > > + } > > > > *offset = (u64)obj->base.map_list.hash.key << PAGE_SHIFT; > > > > -- > > This does not apply... After refreshing and some cleanups... does not build: > > $ LANG=C LC_ALL=C make M=drivers/gpu/drm/i915 > LD drivers/gpu/drm/i915/built-in.o > CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.o > CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.o > CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.o > CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.o > CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.o > CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.o > CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.o > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: In function 'i915_gem_mmap_gtt': > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:1538:3: error: implicit declaration of > function 'DRM_DRIVER_DEBUG' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > make[1]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.o] Error 1 > make: *** [_module_drivers/gpu/drm/i915] Error 2 Bah, try DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER instead. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre