From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33047F5D for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:08:17 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:08:14 -0500 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/48] xfs: implement extended feature masks Message-ID: <20130725220814.GI3111@sgi.com> References: <1370564771-4929-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1370564771-4929-22-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1370564771-4929-22-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:25:44AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > The version 5 superblock has extended feature masks for compatible, > incompatible and read-only compatible feature sets. Implement the > masking and mount-time checking for these feature masks. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner corresponds to commit e721f504cf46a > @@ -214,12 +242,6 @@ xfs_mount_validate_sb( > return XFS_ERROR(ENOSYS); > } > > - > - if (check_inprogress && sbp->sb_inprogress) { > - xfs_warn(mp, "Offline file system operation in progress!"); > - return XFS_ERROR(EFSCORRUPTED); > - } > - Why did this need to be removed? Other than that this looks fine. Reviewed-by: Ben Myers _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs