From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V11 15/18] kvm : Paravirtual ticketlocks support for
	linux guests running on KVM hypervisor
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:52:22 +0200
Message-ID: <20130805135222.GA32429__25309.2754901902$1375710768$gmane$org@gmail.com>
References: <51F0ED31.3040200@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20130725091509.GA22735@redhat.com>
	<51F0F202.5090001@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<51F7ED20.80202@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20130731062440.GK28372@redhat.com>
	<51FA1087.9080908@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20130802092539.GB28327@gmail.com>
	<20130802095406.GB30072@redhat.com>
	<20130805094603.GA29303@gmail.com>
	<20130805095901.GL2258@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130805095901.GL2258@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/>
List-Post: <mailto:virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: jeremy@goop.org, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, drjones@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, andi@firstfloor.org, hpa@zytor.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, mingo@redhat.com, habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com, riel@redhat.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, ouyang@cs.pitt.edu, avi.kivity@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, chegu_vinod@hp.com, gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com, attilio.rao@citrix.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org


* Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:46:03AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> > 
> > I guess you'd want to carry this in the KVM tree or so - maybe in a 
> > separate branch because it changes Xen as well?
> 
> It changes KVM host and guest side, XEN and common x86 spinlock code. I 
> think it would be best to merge common x86 spinlock bits and guest side 
> KVM/XEN bits through tip tree and host KVM part will go through KVM 
> tree. If this is OK with you, Ingo, and XEN folks Raghavendra can send 
> two separate patch series one for the tip and one for KVM host side.

Sure, that's fine - if the initial series works fine in isolation as well 
(i.e. won't break anything).

Thanks,

	Ingo