From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754706Ab3HEVlo (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Aug 2013 17:41:44 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:41297 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754506Ab3HEVlm (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Aug 2013 17:41:42 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 23:41:40 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Andrew Fish , edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Laszlo Ersek , linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov , lkml , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [edk2] Corrupted EFI region Message-ID: <20130805214140.GB14067@pd.tnic> References: <20130801164927.GA7445@pd.tnic> <51FF8C14.2070405@redhat.com> <20130805130258.GB31845@pd.tnic> <51FFAB13.4090603@redhat.com> <20130805140306.GD31845@pd.tnic> <51FFB660.4060400@redhat.com> <20130805144010.GE31845@pd.tnic> <2DBE3EA4-E321-4A7B-B9AF-EDE55BC2E358@apple.com> <20130805181225.GH31845@pd.tnic> <52001B04.2050806@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52001B04.2050806@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:37:08PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > All of this would be a non-problem if there weren't buggy > implementations which can't run *without* SetVirtualAddressMap(). Oh, you mean, if we were to call the runtime services through their physical addresses? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [edk2] Corrupted EFI region Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 23:41:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20130805214140.GB14067@pd.tnic> References: <20130801164927.GA7445@pd.tnic> <51FF8C14.2070405@redhat.com> <20130805130258.GB31845@pd.tnic> <51FFAB13.4090603@redhat.com> <20130805140306.GD31845@pd.tnic> <51FFB660.4060400@redhat.com> <20130805144010.GE31845@pd.tnic> <2DBE3EA4-E321-4A7B-B9AF-EDE55BC2E358@apple.com> <20130805181225.GH31845@pd.tnic> <52001B04.2050806@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52001B04.2050806-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Andrew Fish , edk2-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Laszlo Ersek , linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Gleb Natapov , lkml , David Woodhouse List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:37:08PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > All of this would be a non-problem if there weren't buggy > implementations which can't run *without* SetVirtualAddressMap(). Oh, you mean, if we were to call the runtime services through their physical addresses? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --