From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:30249 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754909Ab3HLRzO (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:55:14 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:54:51 -0400 From: Jason Cooper To: Stephen Warren Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , Lior Amsalem , Andrew Lunn , Russell King , Maen Suleiman , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Gregory Clement , Thierry Reding , Ezequiel Garcia , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Bjorn Helgaas , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 00/10] MSI support for Marvell EBU PCIe driver Message-ID: <20130812175451.GP25111@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1376080035-29344-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20130812163723.GK25111@titan.lakedaemon.net> <520916E0.5030404@wwwdotorg.org> <20130812174439.GO25111@titan.lakedaemon.net> <520920C1.5040904@wwwdotorg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <520920C1.5040904@wwwdotorg.org> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:52:01AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/12/2013 11:44 AM, Jason Cooper wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:09:52AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> On 08/12/2013 10:37 AM, Jason Cooper wrote: > >>> Thomas, > >>> > >>> Whole series applied as follows: > >>> > >>> +---+ mvebu/msi_pci (1-4,7) > >>> | > >>> +---+---+ mvebu/msi_irq (5,6) > >>> | > >>> +---+---+ mvebu/msi_mvebu (8-10) > >>> > >>> mvebu/msi_pci built successfully with Randy's config for x86_64. > >>> > >>> Thierry, I've tagged mvebu/msi_pci. Unless it all falls apart in -next, > >>> those commit-id's won't change from what will be in arm-soc. > >> > >> So, the branch still isn't stable, hence I shouldn't use it as a > >> baseline to apply Thierry's PCIe patches? > > > > It's as stable as I can make it. I've tested it for all known build > > regressions (discovered in -next), and I see no reason to change it. > > Anything needing fixed after today, I'll append the fix to it's HEAD if > > appropriate. > > OK, if you will only append fixes rather than rebase the branch, then > it's fine; what you said above implied that the commit IDs still might > change. Well, that's being generous. ;-) What I said was muddy as hell. Thanks for making me clear that up. > So, I'll try pulling this in with Thierry's patches today. Great! thx, Jason. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jason@lakedaemon.net (Jason Cooper) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:54:51 -0400 Subject: [PATCHv9 00/10] MSI support for Marvell EBU PCIe driver In-Reply-To: <520920C1.5040904@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1376080035-29344-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20130812163723.GK25111@titan.lakedaemon.net> <520916E0.5030404@wwwdotorg.org> <20130812174439.GO25111@titan.lakedaemon.net> <520920C1.5040904@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20130812175451.GP25111@titan.lakedaemon.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:52:01AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/12/2013 11:44 AM, Jason Cooper wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:09:52AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> On 08/12/2013 10:37 AM, Jason Cooper wrote: > >>> Thomas, > >>> > >>> Whole series applied as follows: > >>> > >>> +---+ mvebu/msi_pci (1-4,7) > >>> | > >>> +---+---+ mvebu/msi_irq (5,6) > >>> | > >>> +---+---+ mvebu/msi_mvebu (8-10) > >>> > >>> mvebu/msi_pci built successfully with Randy's config for x86_64. > >>> > >>> Thierry, I've tagged mvebu/msi_pci. Unless it all falls apart in -next, > >>> those commit-id's won't change from what will be in arm-soc. > >> > >> So, the branch still isn't stable, hence I shouldn't use it as a > >> baseline to apply Thierry's PCIe patches? > > > > It's as stable as I can make it. I've tested it for all known build > > regressions (discovered in -next), and I see no reason to change it. > > Anything needing fixed after today, I'll append the fix to it's HEAD if > > appropriate. > > OK, if you will only append fixes rather than rebase the branch, then > it's fine; what you said above implied that the commit IDs still might > change. Well, that's being generous. ;-) What I said was muddy as hell. Thanks for making me clear that up. > So, I'll try pulling this in with Thierry's patches today. Great! thx, Jason.