From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Kiper Subject: Re: Xen 4.4 development update Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:55:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20130812185501.GA23593@router-fw-old.local.net-space.pl> References: <20130809200131.GA3831@router-fw-old.local.net-space.pl> <5208B39002000078000EB087@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5208B39002000078000EB087@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, George Dunlap , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , david.vrabel@citrix.com, ross.philipson@citrix.com, richard.l.maliszewski@intel.com, Daniel Kiper List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:06:08AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 09.08.13 at 22:01, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > - unmodified_drivers should be removed because as I know > > they are not maintained for very long time; if you > > agree I could do that, > > The most recent update to them was on 2013-02-12, so not all > _that_ long ago. We're still using them, so I'd hope that they > could stay in the tree, saving us from having to patch them back > in. As I understood from [1] unmodified_drivers is not maintained. However, if you found out that it was updated quite recently then I do not insist on removing it. 1) http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-06/msg00730.html Daniel