From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [V10 PATCH 11/23] PVH xen: support invalid op
 emulation for PVH
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:13:34 -0700
Message-ID: <20130813181334.79128ec2@mantra.us.oracle.com>
References: <1374631171-15224-1-git-send-email-mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
	<1374631171-15224-12-git-send-email-mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
	<CAFLBxZZyTypo6-8hq8mty=6Dv7_Hn=3kAiXY8wHAQtnf_Jv0rA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130807184912.2115ed40@mantra.us.oracle.com>
	<52035CFE.9020804@eu.citrix.com>
	<20130809191358.42b41cfe@mantra.us.oracle.com>
	<5208AD1A02000078000EB05F@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>) id 1V9Pem-0005b5-GN
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 01:13:48 +0000
In-Reply-To: <5208AD1A02000078000EB05F@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, "keir.xen@gmail.com" <keir.xen@gmail.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:38:34 +0100
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:

> >>> On 10.08.13 at 04:13, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
> >>> wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Aug 2013 09:55:26 +0100
> > George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 08/08/13 02:49, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 12:29:13 +0100
> >> > George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> >> >
....... 
> For what it's worth - I had pointed out the non-logical breakup of
> the series as an issue quite early in the process, and merely gave
> in realizing that your life with this is already difficult enough.

True, and as soon I realized that patches had to be logically organized,
and not by file as I was used to, I completely reorged all the patches
to have them logically broken as best as possible. 

thanks
mukesh