From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759629Ab3HNKeJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Aug 2013 06:34:09 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:41471 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759418Ab3HNKeH (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Aug 2013 06:34:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:33:46 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Peter Maydell , Paul Gortmaker , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ Message-ID: <20130814103346.GN23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <52082EF8.10005@roeck-us.net> <20130812164548.GE23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812200628.GG23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812212149.GH23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812221250.GI23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812230408.GA4420@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130812230408.GA4420@roeck-us.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:04:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Hacked diff is below. Can I write that up as clean patch and submit it, > or do we need a test on real hardware ? Well, if we want to ensure that it is really correct, the sensible thing to do is to try it on real hardware, otherwise we're risking yet another change to this. Earlier in this thread, some people said that they have the hardware, so it shouldn't be that difficult to get it tested on real stuff. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9YPj-000413-Th for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 06:34:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9YPf-0001hC-4R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 06:34:51 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([2002:4e20:1eda::1]:47140) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9YPe-0001g4-Nt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 06:34:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:33:46 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Message-ID: <20130814103346.GN23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <52082EF8.10005@roeck-us.net> <20130812164548.GE23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812200628.GG23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812212149.GH23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812221250.GI23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812230408.GA4420@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130812230408.GA4420@roeck-us.net> Sender: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Paul Gortmaker , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:04:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Hacked diff is below. Can I write that up as clean patch and submit it, > or do we need a test on real hardware ? Well, if we want to ensure that it is really correct, the sensible thing to do is to try it on real hardware, otherwise we're risking yet another change to this. Earlier in this thread, some people said that they have the hardware, so it shouldn't be that difficult to get it tested on real stuff. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:33:46 +0100 Subject: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ In-Reply-To: <20130812230408.GA4420@roeck-us.net> References: <52082EF8.10005@roeck-us.net> <20130812164548.GE23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812200628.GG23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812212149.GH23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812221250.GI23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812230408.GA4420@roeck-us.net> Message-ID: <20130814103346.GN23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:04:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Hacked diff is below. Can I write that up as clean patch and submit it, > or do we need a test on real hardware ? Well, if we want to ensure that it is really correct, the sensible thing to do is to try it on real hardware, otherwise we're risking yet another change to this. Earlier in this thread, some people said that they have the hardware, so it shouldn't be that difficult to get it tested on real stuff.