From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9851C2C0095 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:55:36 +1000 (EST) Received: by mail-pb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id up15so5517850pbc.40 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:55:34 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anatolij Gustschin , From: Mike Turquette In-Reply-To: <20130824000539.5554cad8@crub> References: <1374166855-7280-1-git-send-email-gsi@denx.de> <1374495298-22019-1-git-send-email-gsi@denx.de> <1374495298-22019-14-git-send-email-gsi@denx.de> <20130802223000.6450.97817@quantum> <20130824000539.5554cad8@crub> Message-ID: <20130828005528.8231.80079@quantum> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/31] clk: wrap I/O access for improved portability Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:55:28 -0700 Cc: Gerhard Sittig , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Quoting Anatolij Gustschin (2013-08-23 15:05:39) > On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:30:00 -0700 > Mike Turquette wrote: > = > > Quoting Gerhard Sittig (2013-07-22 05:14:40) > > > the common clock drivers were motivated/initiated by ARM development > > > and apparently assume little endian peripherals > > > = > > > wrap register/peripherals access in the common code (div, gate, mux) > > > in preparation of adding COMMON_CLK support for other platforms > > > = > > > Signed-off-by: Gerhard Sittig > > = > > I've taken this into clk-next for testing. regmap deserves investigation > > but I don't think your series should be blocked on that. We can always > > overhaul the basic clock primitives with regmap support later on if that > > makes sense. > = > Mike, I cannot see it in clk-next branch of > git://git.linaro.org/people/mturquette/linux.git > = > Can you please check? Or am I looking in the wrong place? You were looking in the right place but I had not pushed out the latest patches from my local branch. It should be there now. Regards, Mike > = > Thanks, > Anatolij From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette) Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:55:28 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v3 13/31] clk: wrap I/O access for improved portability In-Reply-To: <20130824000539.5554cad8@crub> References: <1374166855-7280-1-git-send-email-gsi@denx.de> <1374495298-22019-1-git-send-email-gsi@denx.de> <1374495298-22019-14-git-send-email-gsi@denx.de> <20130802223000.6450.97817@quantum> <20130824000539.5554cad8@crub> Message-ID: <20130828005528.8231.80079@quantum> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Quoting Anatolij Gustschin (2013-08-23 15:05:39) > On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:30:00 -0700 > Mike Turquette wrote: > > > Quoting Gerhard Sittig (2013-07-22 05:14:40) > > > the common clock drivers were motivated/initiated by ARM development > > > and apparently assume little endian peripherals > > > > > > wrap register/peripherals access in the common code (div, gate, mux) > > > in preparation of adding COMMON_CLK support for other platforms > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Gerhard Sittig > > > > I've taken this into clk-next for testing. regmap deserves investigation > > but I don't think your series should be blocked on that. We can always > > overhaul the basic clock primitives with regmap support later on if that > > makes sense. > > Mike, I cannot see it in clk-next branch of > git://git.linaro.org/people/mturquette/linux.git > > Can you please check? Or am I looking in the wrong place? You were looking in the right place but I had not pushed out the latest patches from my local branch. It should be there now. Regards, Mike > > Thanks, > Anatolij