From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54859)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1VF4FW-0005Wl-07
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:35:14 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1VF4FN-0007Bk-LG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:35:05 -0400
Received: from mail-ea0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::232]:49045)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1VF4FN-0007BV-Ff
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:34:57 -0400
Received: by mail-ea0-f178.google.com with SMTP id a15so328664eae.23
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 08:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:34:54 +0200
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20130829153454.GG17744@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
References: <1376070245-22557-1-git-send-email-charlie@ctshepherd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1376070245-22557-1-git-send-email-charlie@ctshepherd.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 01/15] Add an explanation of when a
 function should be marked coroutine_fn
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Charlie Shepherd <charlie@ctshepherd.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, gabriel@kerneis.info, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

I have left some comments.  At this point I think a v2 would be good so
that any ripple-effects on later patches can play out.

Stefan