On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 08:02:27PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> 
> it is referring the same differences Russell already mentioned. But I
> already came to the conclusion, that we don't need the information in
> the binding. For example, if you use that controller on Dove and you
> hook it up for SPDIF-in (which it hasn't), than I consider this a
> DT bug. No need to double-check that in the driver. From that p-o-v,
> please just let the current binding as is.

OK, great - none of these devices have any differences which are visible
only within the controller, they're all extra external interfaces?

> Thomas Petazzoni mentioned earlier, that the _usual_ procedure to
> name the compatibles is to pick the SoC that the IP appeared in first.
> But I am also fine with "marvell,mvebu-audio" and adding compatibles
> for dove or kirkwood _if_ we will ever need them.

Yeah, it doesn't make much difference either way so long as the base
name isn't utterly confusing.