From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763615Ab3IEMp0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2013 08:45:26 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41351 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761641Ab3IEMpY (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2013 08:45:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 14:45:23 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: azurIt Cc: Johannes Weiner , Andrew Morton , David Rientjes , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , KOSAKI Motohiro , linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] improve memcg oom killer robustness v2 Message-ID: <20130905124523.GC13666@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20130904115741.GA28285@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20130904141000.0F910EFA@pobox.sk> <20130904122632.GB28285@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20130905111430.CB1392B4@pobox.sk> <20130905095331.GA9702@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20130905121700.546B5881@pobox.sk> <20130905111742.GC9702@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20130905134702.C703F65B@pobox.sk> <20130905120347.GA13666@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20130905143343.AF56A889@pobox.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130905143343.AF56A889@pobox.sk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 05-09-13 14:33:43, azurIt wrote: [...] > >Just to be sure I got you right. You have killed all the processes from > >the group you have sent stacks for, right? If that is the case I am > >really curious about processes sitting in sleep_on_page_killable because > >those are killable by definition. > > Yes, my script killed all of that processes right after taking > stack. OK, _after_ part is important. Has the group gone away after then? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] improve memcg oom killer robustness v2 Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 14:45:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20130905124523.GC13666@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20130904115741.GA28285@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20130904141000.0F910EFA@pobox.sk> <20130904122632.GB28285@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20130905111430.CB1392B4@pobox.sk> <20130905095331.GA9702@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20130905121700.546B5881@pobox.sk> <20130905111742.GC9702@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20130905134702.C703F65B@pobox.sk> <20130905120347.GA13666@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20130905143343.AF56A889@pobox.sk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130905143343.AF56A889@pobox.sk> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: azurIt Cc: Johannes Weiner , Andrew Morton , David Rientjes , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , KOSAKI Motohiro , linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Thu 05-09-13 14:33:43, azurIt wrote: [...] > >Just to be sure I got you right. You have killed all the processes from > >the group you have sent stacks for, right? If that is the case I am > >really curious about processes sitting in sleep_on_page_killable because > >those are killable by definition. > > Yes, my script killed all of that processes right after taking > stack. OK, _after_ part is important. Has the group gone away after then? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org