From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752649Ab3IROfk (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:35:40 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:59786 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751500Ab3IROfj (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:35:39 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:35:37 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= , Felipe Balbi , Tony Lindgren , Anton Vorontsov , Russell King , David Woodhouse , Greg Kroah-Hartman , freemangordon@abv.bg, Aaro Koskinen , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux Kernel , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] usb: musb: Call atomic_notifier_call_chain when status is changed Message-ID: <20130918143537.GA4914@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> References: <1378630239-10006-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <201309172128.42514@pali> <20130918014942.GD19817@radagast> <201309181020.15245@pali> <20130918133025.GB2953@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20130918142203.GD3748@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130918142203.GD3748@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > gave feedback. If the sender doesn't want to take his feedback into > > account and prefer to send pretty insulting emails instead that is his > > choice but I would say that is this not the greatest approach to get > > your code merged (to say the least). > > Clearly not. But Pali found bug in code Felipe should > maintain. Instead of "thank you for bug report, I applied this one > line of your code to fix it", Pali got "new patch, new email" for his > efforts. That is how you train dogs, not how you should treat kernel > contributors. > > Now, it is possible that Felipe just has problems with english, as he > called me piece of wood in https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/17/476 , but > he appears more arogant than usual over email. Actually he called me "piece of wood with garbage in it". I guess I have right to be offended. I'm baby in the next email. Hmm. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek) Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:35:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] usb: musb: Call atomic_notifier_call_chain when status is changed In-Reply-To: <20130918142203.GD3748@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> References: <1378630239-10006-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <201309172128.42514@pali> <20130918014942.GD19817@radagast> <201309181020.15245@pali> <20130918133025.GB2953@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20130918142203.GD3748@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> Message-ID: <20130918143537.GA4914@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi! > > gave feedback. If the sender doesn't want to take his feedback into > > account and prefer to send pretty insulting emails instead that is his > > choice but I would say that is this not the greatest approach to get > > your code merged (to say the least). > > Clearly not. But Pali found bug in code Felipe should > maintain. Instead of "thank you for bug report, I applied this one > line of your code to fix it", Pali got "new patch, new email" for his > efforts. That is how you train dogs, not how you should treat kernel > contributors. > > Now, it is possible that Felipe just has problems with english, as he > called me piece of wood in https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/17/476 , but > he appears more arogant than usual over email. Actually he called me "piece of wood with garbage in it". I guess I have right to be offended. I'm baby in the next email. Hmm. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html