From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753328Ab3ITRlu (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Sep 2013 13:41:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f51.google.com ([209.85.160.51]:47048 "EHLO mail-pb0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752991Ab3ITRlt (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Sep 2013 13:41:49 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 10:41:44 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Peter Anvin , Mike Galbraith , Arjanvan@roeck-us.net Subject: Re: [patch 2/6] h8300: Use schedule_preempt_irq Message-ID: <20130920174144.GA30356@roeck-us.net> References: <20130917082838.218329307@infradead.org> <20130917182350.449685712@linutronix.de> <20130917183628.646285522@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130917183628.646285522@linutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 06:53:06PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Use the proper function instead of fiddling with PREEMPT_ACTIVE and > interrupt enable/disable in the low level code. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Yoshinori Sato > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven > This will result in a conflict in -next as h8300 support has been removed there, and I'll send a pull request to Linus in the next commit window. Guenter