From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752988Ab3IWOuY (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:50:24 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:6405 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752306Ab3IWOuW (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:50:22 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=fJG7LOme c=1 sm=0 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:17 a=Drc5e87SC40A:10 a=6uerBSPhkSsA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=rzOjJkEkrDcA:10 a=JfrnYn6hAAAA:8 a=LzSW3Tvbkn5jqZEmjMAA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=3Rfx1nUSh_UA:10 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 67.255.60.225 Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:50:17 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , Srikar Dronamraju , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Johannes Weiner , Linux-MM , LKML , Oleg Nesterov , Paul McKenney , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH] hotplug: Optimize {get,put}_online_cpus() Message-ID: <20130923105017.030e0aef@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20130919143241.GB26785@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1378805550-29949-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <1378805550-29949-38-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <20130917143003.GA29354@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130917162050.GK22421@suse.de> <20130917164505.GG12926@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130918154939.GZ26785@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130919143241.GB26785@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:32:41 +0200 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > +extern void __get_online_cpus(void); > + > +static inline void get_online_cpus(void) > +{ > + might_sleep(); > + > + preempt_disable(); > + if (likely(!__cpuhp_writer || __cpuhp_writer == current)) > + this_cpu_inc(__cpuhp_refcount); > + else > + __get_online_cpus(); > + preempt_enable(); > +} This isn't much different than srcu_read_lock(). What about doing something like this: static inline void get_online_cpus(void) { might_sleep(); srcu_read_lock(&cpuhp_srcu); if (unlikely(__cpuhp_writer || __cpuhp_writer != current)) { srcu_read_unlock(&cpuhp_srcu); __get_online_cpus(); current->online_cpus_held++; } } static inline void put_online_cpus(void) { if (unlikely(current->online_cpus_held)) { current->online_cpus_held--; __put_online_cpus(); return; } srcu_read_unlock(&cpuhp_srcu); } Then have the writer simply do: __cpuhp_write = current; synchronize_srcu(&cpuhp_srcu); -- Steve From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com (mail-pa0-f51.google.com [209.85.220.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FDF6B0037 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:50:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id kp14so2393102pab.10 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 07:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:50:17 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH] hotplug: Optimize {get,put}_online_cpus() Message-ID: <20130923105017.030e0aef@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20130919143241.GB26785@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1378805550-29949-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <1378805550-29949-38-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <20130917143003.GA29354@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130917162050.GK22421@suse.de> <20130917164505.GG12926@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130918154939.GZ26785@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130919143241.GB26785@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , Srikar Dronamraju , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Johannes Weiner , Linux-MM , LKML , Oleg Nesterov , Paul McKenney , Thomas Gleixner On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:32:41 +0200 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > +extern void __get_online_cpus(void); > + > +static inline void get_online_cpus(void) > +{ > + might_sleep(); > + > + preempt_disable(); > + if (likely(!__cpuhp_writer || __cpuhp_writer == current)) > + this_cpu_inc(__cpuhp_refcount); > + else > + __get_online_cpus(); > + preempt_enable(); > +} This isn't much different than srcu_read_lock(). What about doing something like this: static inline void get_online_cpus(void) { might_sleep(); srcu_read_lock(&cpuhp_srcu); if (unlikely(__cpuhp_writer || __cpuhp_writer != current)) { srcu_read_unlock(&cpuhp_srcu); __get_online_cpus(); current->online_cpus_held++; } } static inline void put_online_cpus(void) { if (unlikely(current->online_cpus_held)) { current->online_cpus_held--; __put_online_cpus(); return; } srcu_read_unlock(&cpuhp_srcu); } Then have the writer simply do: __cpuhp_write = current; synchronize_srcu(&cpuhp_srcu); -- Steve -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org