From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755389Ab3I3Rx6 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:53:58 -0400
Received: from mail-qa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.216.49]:52170 "EHLO
	mail-qa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752788Ab3I3Rx5 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:53:57 -0400
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:53:42 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf auto-dep: Speed up feature tests by building them
 in parallel
Message-ID: <20130930175342.GI10293@ghostprotocols.net>
References: <CA+55aFyCeXXr=57em8CC_Uzfk5PvOw0RHyA309wuOP-oDL7VxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130912184341.GA11400@ghostprotocols.net>
 <52321CE4.1080804@gmail.com>
 <20130912200236.GC11400@ghostprotocols.net>
 <20130912203116.GD32644@gmail.com>
 <20130912204313.GA3259@gmail.com>
 <20130915091029.GA21465@gmail.com>
 <20130930164210.GA22342@gmail.com>
 <20130930171220.GC10293@ghostprotocols.net>
 <CA+55aFyjtFo2GVAvvUD_BQBN-F6QzOVWzcFo5v_MLhEwpGa03w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyjtFo2GVAvvUD_BQBN-F6QzOVWzcFo5v_MLhEwpGa03w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Em Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:34:27AM -0700, Linus Torvalds escreveu:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <acme@ghostprotocols.net> wrote:
> >
> > Checking why that strlcpy failed...
> 
> I don't think glibc does strlcpy. It's not a standard C function, and

My concern was more about the thinking: ``Is this red "OFF" thing a
problem?  I feel so much more confortable when all entries have nice
green "on" lights...''

> it's somewhat controversial (although I dislike strncpy more with the
> crazy zero-padding, ugh).

:-)

- Arnaldo