From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: Unbreak build
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:48:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131010104840.GC6735@ulmo.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381329703.4971.18.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 765 bytes --]
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 07:41:43AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 16:14 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > IPv6 specific fields in struct sock_common are accessed in various
> > places even if IPv6 support is disabled. Fix this by including the
> > fields unconditionally.
>
> Well no. There is a reason we keep CONFIG_IPV6 at all.
>
> The right fix is under review :
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/281784/
Yes that's obviously the better fix. In fact doing exactly that was my
first instinct as well, but it seemed to be more invasive and I really
just wanted a temporary fix for the build errors.
I see that David has already applied the above patch, so this band-aid
should no longer be necessary.
Thanks,
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-10 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-09 14:14 linux-next: Tree for Oct 9 Thierry Reding
2013-10-09 14:14 ` [PATCH] ipv6: Unbreak build Thierry Reding
2013-10-09 14:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-10 10:48 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2013-10-09 14:14 ` linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-09 14:14 ` linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-09 14:14 ` linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-09 16:56 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-10-09 14:14 ` linux-next: manual merge of the mvebu tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-09 14:21 ` Jason Cooper
2013-10-09 14:37 ` Jason Cooper
2013-10-10 10:57 ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-10 11:40 ` Jason Cooper
2013-10-09 15:29 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 9 Guenter Roeck
2013-10-09 15:44 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-09 17:55 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131010104840.GC6735@ulmo.nvidia.com \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.