All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com,
	ak@linux.intel.com, jmario@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@infradead.org
Subject: Re: x86, perf: throttling issues with long nmi latencies
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:14:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131015101404.GD10651@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131014203549.GY227855@redhat.com>

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 04:35:49PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:

> This gave more stable numbers such that I could now narrow things down.
> While there are a few places that are causing latencies, for now I focused on
> the longest one first.  It seems to be 'copy_user_from_nmi'
> 
> intel_pmu_handle_irq ->
> 	intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm ->
> 		__intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm ->
> 			__intel_pmu_pebs_event ->
> 				intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip ->
> 					copy_from_user_nmi
> 
> In intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip(), if the while-loop goes over 50, the sum of
> all the copy_from_user_nmi latencies seems to go over 1,000,000 cycles
> (there are some cases where only 10 iterations are needed to go that high
> too, but in generall over 50 or so).  At this point copy_user_from_nmi
> seems to account for over 90% of the nmi latency.

What does the below do? It appears the perf userspace lost the ability
to display the MISC_EXACT_IP percentage so I've no clue if it actually
works or not.

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
index 32e9ed81cd00..3978e72a1c9f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
@@ -722,6 +722,8 @@ void intel_pmu_pebs_disable_all(void)
 		wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE, 0);
 }
 
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u8 [PAGE_SIZE], insn_page);
+
 static int intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
@@ -729,6 +731,8 @@ static int intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	unsigned long old_to, to = cpuc->lbr_entries[0].to;
 	unsigned long ip = regs->ip;
 	int is_64bit = 0;
+	int size, bytes;
+	void *kaddr;
 
 	/*
 	 * We don't need to fixup if the PEBS assist is fault like
@@ -763,29 +767,44 @@ static int intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		return 1;
 	}
 
+refill:
+	if (kernel_ip(ip)) {
+		u8 *buf = &__get_cpu_var(insn_page[0]);
+		size = PAGE_SIZE - ((unsigned long)to & (PAGE_SIZE-1));
+		if (size < MAX_INSN_SIZE) {
+			/*
+			 * If we're going to have to touch two pages; just copy
+			 * as much as we can hold.
+			 */
+			size = PAGE_SIZE;
+		}
+		bytes = copy_from_user_nmi(buf, (void __user *)to, size);
+		if (bytes != size)
+			return 0;
+
+		kaddr = buf;
+	} else {
+		size = INT_MAX;
+		kaddr = (void *)to;
+	}
+
 	do {
 		struct insn insn;
-		u8 buf[MAX_INSN_SIZE];
-		void *kaddr;
-
-		old_to = to;
-		if (!kernel_ip(ip)) {
-			int bytes, size = MAX_INSN_SIZE;
 
-			bytes = copy_from_user_nmi(buf, (void __user *)to, size);
-			if (bytes != size)
-				return 0;
+		if (size < MAX_INSN_SIZE)
+			goto refill;
 
-			kaddr = buf;
-		} else
-			kaddr = (void *)to;
+		old_to = to;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 		is_64bit = kernel_ip(to) || !test_thread_flag(TIF_IA32);
 #endif
 		insn_init(&insn, kaddr, is_64bit);
 		insn_get_length(&insn);
+
 		to += insn.length;
+		kaddr += insn.length;
+		size -= insn.length;
 	} while (to < ip);
 
 	if (to == ip) {

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-15 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-14 20:35 x86, perf: throttling issues with long nmi latencies Don Zickus
2013-10-14 21:28 ` Andi Kleen
2013-10-15 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-10-15 13:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 14:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 15:07       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 15:41         ` Don Zickus
2013-10-16 10:57           ` [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimize intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip() Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 12:46             ` Don Zickus
2013-10-16 13:31               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 13:54                 ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 11:21                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 13:33                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-29 14:07                   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86: Fix NMI measurements tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 20:52             ` [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimize intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip() Andi Kleen
2013-10-16 21:03               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 23:07                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17  9:41                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 16:00                     ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 16:04                       ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 16:30                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 18:26                           ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-17 21:08                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 21:11                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 22:01                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 22:27                               ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-22 21:12                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-23  7:09                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-23 20:48                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-24 10:52                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-24 13:47                                         ` Don Zickus
2013-10-24 14:06                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-25 16:33                                         ` Don Zickus
2013-10-25 17:03                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-26 10:36                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-28 13:19                                             ` Don Zickus
2013-10-29 14:08                                         ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Further optimize copy_from_user_nmi() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-23  7:44                                   ` [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimize intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip() Ingo Molnar
2013-10-17 14:49             ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 14:51               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 15:03                 ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 15:09                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 15:11                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 16:50             ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 16:22         ` x86, perf: throttling issues with long nmi latencies Don Zickus
2013-10-15 14:36     ` Don Zickus
2013-10-15 14:39       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131015101404.GD10651@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jmario@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.