From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756632Ab3J1O3U (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:29:20 -0400 Received: from mail-gg0-f176.google.com ([209.85.161.176]:38409 "EHLO mail-gg0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756347Ab3J1O3T (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:29:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:29:12 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Namhyung Kim , David Ahern , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Jiri Olsa , Ingo Molnar , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] perf tools: Add new comm infrastructure Message-ID: <20131028142912.GF16948@ghostprotocols.net> References: <20131025130417.GB20423@ghostprotocols.net> <526A8F54.2040601@gmail.com> <526AB61B.80505@gmail.com> <871u369cq0.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> <8738nl92oh.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> <20131028101248.GA6491@localhost.localdomain> <20131028124309.GE16948@ghostprotocols.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131028124309.GE16948@ghostprotocols.net> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 09:43:09AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:12:50AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 06:15:26PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:09:46 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > Ah cool! Could you please remind me the name of that branch so that I > > > > can do some tests and work on top of it? > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git > > > perf/callchain-v5 > > Hmm, I tried to rebase on top of tip:perf/core and git is getting confused I guess with > > which is applied and which is out of tree. There have been a lot of changes since > > then and thus quite some conflicts. > > > > If you don't mind, I would love if you rebase against latest tip:perf/core as you > > know better than me what has been applied and what hasn't. > I'll try to do it now. Can you please try with: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git perf/comm And share your results? I fixed up everything wrt recent flux in my perf/core branch, did just basic testing here, but so far it looks ok (and fast!). - Arnaldo