From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:18:17 +0200 From: Andrei Emeltchenko To: Jerzy Kasenberg Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/9] Improve logging for Android Message-ID: <20131029121811.GE27517@aemeltch-MOBL1> References: <1382957047-31775-1-git-send-email-Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com> <1383042118-21205-1-git-send-email-Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Jerzy, On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:43:32PM +0100, Jerzy Kasenberg wrote: > Hi Andrei, > > On 29 October 2013 11:21, Andrei Emeltchenko > wrote: > > From: Andrei Emeltchenko > > > > Changes: > > *v2: Added thread-safe helpers for printing properties, bdaddr, etc > > after comments that simple printing is not thread-safe. The idea is to > > use TLS (thread local storage) like bionic is doing for strerror for > > Implementation of strerror in bionic and what is proposed here is > thread safe but not > useful if one wants to use one print to for two addresses or two > properties (one buffer > in one thread for two strings). Then just print 2 times. > In my opinion there should be safe functions that explicitly get > string buffer as > argument. For address and uuid they already exist, property printing > was used in haltest > only in one place and moving buffer form btproperty2str to function > that calls it > makes sense to me. Then every function calling need to define a buffer and for property the buffer is not small. For example current code ... static int set_adapter_property(const bt_property_t *property) { char buf[sizeof(struct hal_cmd_set_adapter_prop) + property->len]; struct hal_cmd_set_adapter_prop *cmd = (void *) buf; DBG("prop: %s", btproperty2str(property)); ... would need to define 4K buffer !!!, the same for many other functions. > > If there is need for shortcut as for code lines that could be removed > in compilation, > wrapper function with pthread stuff can still be used (provided that > there is no same > type conversion call used in one print) > > BTW strerror() works fine when called with value in range 0..131. > But when you call it with higher number there will be a problem > printf("%s\n%s\n\%s\n%s\n", strerror(1), strerror(2), strerror(132), > strerror(133)); > prints: > Operation not permitted > No such file or directory > Unknown error 133 > Unknown error 133 Yes, just print 2 times :) Best regards Andrei Emeltchenko