From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753532Ab3KLKzX (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2013 05:55:23 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:55622 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751336Ab3KLKzV (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2013 05:55:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:55:08 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Vincent Guittot Cc: linux-kernel , Ingo Molnar , Paul Turner , Morten Rasmussen , "cmetcalf@tilera.com" , "tony.luck@intel.com" , Alex Shi , Preeti U Murthy , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Paul McKenney , Jonathan Corbet , Thomas Gleixner , Len Brown , Arjan van de Ven , Amit Kucheria , Lukasz Majewski Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v5 05/14] sched: add a packing level knob Message-ID: <20131112105508.GN5056@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1382097147-30088-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <1382097147-30088-5-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20131112103228.GE4971@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:44:15AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On 12 November 2013 11:32, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:52:18PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > >> +int sched_proc_update_packing(struct ctl_table *table, int write, > >> + void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, > >> + loff_t *ppos) > >> +{ > >> + int ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos); > >> + if (ret || !write) > >> + return ret; > >> + > >> + if (sysctl_sched_packing_level) > >> + sd_pack_threshold = (100 * 1024) / sysctl_sched_packing_level; > >> + > >> + return 0; > >> +} > > > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PACKING_TASKS > >> +static int min_sched_packing_level; > >> +static int max_sched_packing_level = 100; > >> +#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ > > > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PACKING_TASKS > >> + { > >> + .procname = "sched_packing_level", > >> + .data = &sysctl_sched_packing_level, > >> + .maxlen = sizeof(int), > >> + .mode = 0644, > >> + .proc_handler = sched_proc_update_packing, > >> + .extra1 = &min_sched_packing_level, > >> + .extra2 = &max_sched_packing_level, > >> + }, > >> +#endif > > > > Shouldn't min_sched_packing_level be 1? Userspace can now write 0 and > > expect something; but then we don't update sd_pack_threshold so nothing > > really changed. > > value 0 is used to disable to packing feature and the scheduler falls > back to default behavior. This value is tested when setting which cpus > will be used by the scheduler. I suspected as much, but it wasn't clear from the Changelog, the patch or any comments. Plz as to fix.