From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/2] xen: enable vnuma for PV guest
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:16:20 -0500
Message-ID: <20131119141620.GD5332__39434.1013780378$1384870767$gmane$org@phenom.dumpdata.com>
References: <1384811922-14642-1-git-send-email-ufimtseva@gmail.com>
	<1384811922-14642-3-git-send-email-ufimtseva@gmail.com>
	<528B5160.5010902@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>) id 1Vim7q-000810-2I
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:17:58 +0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <528B5160.5010902@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com, mingo@redhat.com, Elena Ufimtseva <ufimtseva@gmail.com>, hpa@zytor.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, tglx@linutronix.de, ian.campbell@citrix.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:54:08AM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 18/11/13 21:58, Elena Ufimtseva wrote:
> > Enables numa if vnuma topology hypercall is supported and it is domU.
> [...]
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> >  #include <asm/numa.h>
> >  #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
> >  #include <asm/xen/hypercall.h>
> > +#include <asm/xen/vnuma.h>
> >  
> >  #include <xen/xen.h>
> >  #include <xen/page.h>
> > @@ -598,6 +599,9 @@ void __init xen_arch_setup(void)
> >  	WARN_ON(xen_set_default_idle());
> >  	fiddle_vdso();
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> > -	numa_off = 1;
> > +	if (!xen_initial_domain() && xen_vnuma_supported())
> > +		numa_off = 0;
> > +	else
> > +		numa_off = 1;
> >  #endif
> >  }
> 
> I think this whole #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA can be removed and hence
> xen_vnuma_supported() can be removed as well.
> 
> For any PV guest we can call the xen_numa_init() and it will do the
> right thing.
> 
> For dom0, the hypercall will either: return something sensible (if in
> the future Xen sets something up), or it will error.
> 
> If Xen does not have vnuma support, the hypercall will error.
> 
> In both error cases, the dummy numa node is setup as required.

Incorrect. It will end up calling:

                 if (!numa_init(amd_numa_init))                                  

which will crash dom0 (see 8d54db795 "xen/boot: Disable NUMA for PV guests.")
as that amd_numa_init is called before the dummy node init.

> 
> If you do this, you can fold this change in with the previous patch.
> 
> David