On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 09:31:25AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:

> ... so, I thought you were OK with that one issue. Were there other
> issues you didn't mention before?

Probably not but I'd need to reread it, I don't think I got that much
further than noticing that there weren't any clock changes (the fact
that the clock dependency was getting added in a DMA series set off
alarm bells).  To be honest given the number of revisions that seem to
be required I'd been expecting to see a respin of the series, the ASoC
generic DMA changes did need a respin before they can be merged and I do
want to get them into the ASoC tree.