From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932553Ab3KZS7J (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:59:09 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:56005 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932405Ab3KZS7C (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:59:02 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 19:58:47 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Tony Luck Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Ingo Molnar , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Peter Anvin , Mike Galbraith , Arjan van de Ven , Frederic Weisbecker , Fenghua Yu Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] ia64: Use preempt_schedule_irq Message-ID: <20131126185847.GE789@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20130917082838.218329307@infradead.org> <20130917182350.449685712@linutronix.de> <20130917183628.857145384@linutronix.de> <20131121130605.GE10022@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:37:59AM -0800, Tony Luck wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Tony Luck wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> On Thu, 21 Nov 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >>> Anyway, I don't object to the patch per se, but it might bloat a few > >>> !ia64 kernels for having to carry the extra text. > > > > I tried it out ... if does fix both build & boot for ia64 with > > PREMPT=n and PREMPT=y > > > > Tested-by: Tony Luck > > So - are we going with this patch? Or still thinking of something better? I queued it; let me prod Ingo (again) into actually merging it.