From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47561) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrXyd-0001f4-Is for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:00:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrXyX-0008Tz-AV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:00:43 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11012) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrXyX-0008Tf-2f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:00:37 -0500 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBDJ0Z3Q009352 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:00:35 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 20:00:31 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20131213190006.GR3916@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> References: <1386954633-28905-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> <1386954633-28905-3-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1386954633-28905-3-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 02/22] blkdebug: Don't require sophisticated filename List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz Cc: Fam Zheng , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi Am 13.12.2013 um 18:10 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > If the filename is not prefixed by "blkdebug:" in > blkdebug_parse_filename(), the blkdebug driver was not selected through > that protocol prefix, but by an explicit command line option > (file.driver=blkdebug or something similar). Contrary to the current > reaction, this is not a problem at all; we just need to store the > filename (in the x-image option) and can go on; the user just has to > manually specify the config option. > > Signed-off-by: Max Reitz x-image must die, but why not, as an intermediate step. Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf