All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
	Mark Lord <kernel@start.ca>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] PCI/MSI: Introduce pci_auto_enable_msi*() family helpers
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:23:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131218132349.GA29552@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131218003002.GA15119@google.com>

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 05:30:02PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

Hi Bjorn,

Thank you for the review!

Sorry for a heavy skipping - I just wanted to focus on a principal
moment in your suggestion and then go on with the original note.

> I only see five users of pci_enable_msi_block() (nvme, ath10k, wil6210,
> ipr, vfio); we can easily convert those to use pci_enable_msi_range() and
> then remove pci_enable_msi_block().

> It would be good if pci_enable_msix() could be implemented in terms of
> pci_enable_msix_range(nvec, nvec), with a little extra glue to handle the
> positive return values.

So you want to get rid of the tri-state "low-level" pci_enable_msi_block()
and pci_enable_msix(), right? I believe we can not do this, since we need
to support a non-standard hardware which (a) can not be asked any arbitrary
number of vectors within a range and (b) needs extra magic to enable MSI
operation.

I.e. below is a snippet from a real device driver Mark Lord has sent in a
previous conversation:

        xx_disable_all_irqs(dev);
        do {
            	if (nvec < 2)
                        xx_prep_for_1_msix_vector(dev);
                else if (nvec < 4)
                        xx_prep_for_2_msix_vectors(dev);
                else if (nvec < 8)
                        xx_prep_for_4_msix_vectors(dev);
                else if (nvec < 16)
                        xx_prep_for_8_msix_vectors(dev);
                else
                    	xx_prep_for_16_msix_vectors(dev);
                nvec = pci_enable_msix(dev->pdev, dev->irqs, dev->num_vectors);
       	} while (nvec > 0);

The same probably could have been done with pci_enable_msix_range(nvec, nvec)
call and checking for -ENOSPC errno, but IMO it would be less graceful and
reliable, since -ENOSPC might come from anywhere.

IOW, I believe we need to keep the door open for custom MSI-enablement (loop)
implementations.

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@redhat.com

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-18 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-16  8:34 [PATCH v4 0/9] PCI/MSI: Introduce pci_auto_enable_msi*() family helpers Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-16  8:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] PCI/MSI/s390: Fix single MSI only check Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-16  8:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] PCI/MSI/s390: Remove superfluous check of MSI type Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-16  8:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] PCI/MSI: Fix return value when populate_msi_sysfs() failed Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-16  8:34 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] PCI/MSI: Return -ENOSYS for unimplemented interfaces, not -1 Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-16  8:34 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] PCI/MSI: Make pci_enable_msi/msix() 'nvec' argument type as int Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-16  8:34 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] PCI/MSI: Factor out pci_get_msi_vec_count() interface Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-18  0:33   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-12-16  8:35 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] PCI/MSI: Get rid of pci_enable_msi_block_auto() interface Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-16  8:35 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] PCI/MSI: Introduce pci_get_msix_vec_count() interface Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-16  8:35 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] PCI/MSI: Introduce pci_auto_enable_msi*() family helpers Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-18  0:30   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-12-18 13:23     ` Alexander Gordeev [this message]
2013-12-18 18:58       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-12-19 13:42         ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-19 13:47           ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-19 21:37           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-12-20  9:04             ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-20 13:28               ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-20 10:28     ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-23 14:44     ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-23 17:19       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-12-19 22:30 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] " Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131218132349.GA29552@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=agordeev@redhat.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kernel@start.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.