From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754229AbaAFNJR (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jan 2014 08:09:17 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38348 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750950AbaAFNJQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jan 2014 08:09:16 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 13:09:12 +0000 From: Mel Gorman To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Hellstrom , Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Calculate effective load even if local weight is 0 Message-ID: <20140106130912.GD6178@suse.de> References: <20140106113912.GC6178@suse.de> <20140106123420.GJ31570@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140106123420.GJ31570@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 01:34:20PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:39:12AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > > (Rik, you authored this patch so it should be sent from you and needs a > > signed-off assuming people are ok with the changelog.) > > Where did all this take place? I saw the initial email I think but then > nothing.. > > Not that I was reading much email the past two weeks anyway :-) Much of the discussion was on the bugzilla entry https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67601 which is rare but it happens. In retrospect, I should also have included a blurb saying that the patch resolved the bug but it's not that big a deal. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs