From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754170AbaAIHQk (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2014 02:16:40 -0500 Received: from LGEMRELSE7Q.lge.com ([156.147.1.151]:45039 "EHLO LGEMRELSE7Q.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751212AbaAIHQi (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2014 02:16:38 -0500 X-AuditID: 9c930197-b7b37ae000002e5a-94-52ce4cd4b0f8 Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:16:56 +0900 From: Joonsoo Kim To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: possible regression on 3.13 when calling flush_dcache_page Message-ID: <20140109071656.GA10290@lge.com> References: <20131212143618.GJ12099@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> <20131213015909.GA8845@lge.com> <20131216144343.GD9627@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> <20131218072117.GA2383@lge.com> <20131220080851.GC16592@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> <20131223224435.GD16592@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> <20131224063837.GA27156@lge.com> <20140103145404.GC18002@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> <20140106002648.GC696@lge.com> <20140106093408.GA2816@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140106093408.GA2816@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:34:09AM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:26:48AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 03:54:04PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 03:38:37PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that this commit may not introduce a bug. This patch remove one > > > > > > > > > variable on slab management structure and replace variable name. So there > > > > > > > > > is no functional change. > > > > > > You are right, the commit given by git bisect was not the good one... > > > Since I removed other patches done on top of it, I thought it really was > > > this one but in fact it is 8456a64. > > > > Okay. It seems more reasonable to me. > > I guess that this is the same issue with following link. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/4/81 > > > > And, perhaps, that patch solves your problem. But I'm not sure that it is the > > best solution for this problem. I should discuss with slab maintainers. > > Yes this patch solves my problem. > > > > > I will think about this problem more deeply and report the solution to you > > as soon as possible. > > Ok thanks. > Hello, That patch will be merged through Andrew's tree. Use it to fix your problem :) Thanks. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f176.google.com (mail-pd0-f176.google.com [209.85.192.176]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2496B0031 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 02:16:40 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pd0-f176.google.com with SMTP id w10so2818964pde.7 for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 23:16:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from LGEMRELSE7Q.lge.com (LGEMRELSE7Q.lge.com. [156.147.1.151]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id pt8si3001314pac.134.2014.01.08.23.16.37 for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 23:16:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:16:56 +0900 From: Joonsoo Kim Subject: Re: possible regression on 3.13 when calling flush_dcache_page Message-ID: <20140109071656.GA10290@lge.com> References: <20131212143618.GJ12099@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> <20131213015909.GA8845@lge.com> <20131216144343.GD9627@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> <20131218072117.GA2383@lge.com> <20131220080851.GC16592@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> <20131223224435.GD16592@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> <20131224063837.GA27156@lge.com> <20140103145404.GC18002@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> <20140106002648.GC696@lge.com> <20140106093408.GA2816@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140106093408.GA2816@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:34:09AM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:26:48AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 03:54:04PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 03:38:37PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that this commit may not introduce a bug. This patch remove one > > > > > > > > > variable on slab management structure and replace variable name. So there > > > > > > > > > is no functional change. > > > > > > You are right, the commit given by git bisect was not the good one... > > > Since I removed other patches done on top of it, I thought it really was > > > this one but in fact it is 8456a64. > > > > Okay. It seems more reasonable to me. > > I guess that this is the same issue with following link. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/4/81 > > > > And, perhaps, that patch solves your problem. But I'm not sure that it is the > > best solution for this problem. I should discuss with slab maintainers. > > Yes this patch solves my problem. > > > > > I will think about this problem more deeply and report the solution to you > > as soon as possible. > > Ok thanks. > Hello, That patch will be merged through Andrew's tree. Use it to fix your problem :) Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com (Joonsoo Kim) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:16:56 +0900 Subject: possible regression on 3.13 when calling flush_dcache_page In-Reply-To: <20140106093408.GA2816@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> References: <20131212143618.GJ12099@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> <20131213015909.GA8845@lge.com> <20131216144343.GD9627@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> <20131218072117.GA2383@lge.com> <20131220080851.GC16592@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> <20131223224435.GD16592@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> <20131224063837.GA27156@lge.com> <20140103145404.GC18002@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> <20140106002648.GC696@lge.com> <20140106093408.GA2816@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> Message-ID: <20140109071656.GA10290@lge.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:34:09AM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:26:48AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 03:54:04PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 03:38:37PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that this commit may not introduce a bug. This patch remove one > > > > > > > > > variable on slab management structure and replace variable name. So there > > > > > > > > > is no functional change. > > > > > > You are right, the commit given by git bisect was not the good one... > > > Since I removed other patches done on top of it, I thought it really was > > > this one but in fact it is 8456a64. > > > > Okay. It seems more reasonable to me. > > I guess that this is the same issue with following link. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/4/81 > > > > And, perhaps, that patch solves your problem. But I'm not sure that it is the > > best solution for this problem. I should discuss with slab maintainers. > > Yes this patch solves my problem. > > > > > I will think about this problem more deeply and report the solution to you > > as soon as possible. > > Ok thanks. > Hello, That patch will be merged through Andrew's tree. Use it to fix your problem :) Thanks.