From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756029AbaA2FbO (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:31:14 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:19555 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750845AbaA2FbM (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:31:12 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,740,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="446213019" Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:53:34 +0530 From: Jenny Tc To: Pavel Machek Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , Anton Vorontsov , Anton Vorontsov , Kim Milo , Lee Jones , Jingoo Han , Chanwoo Choi , Sachin Kamat , Rupesh Kumar , Lars-Peter Clausen , Pali Roh?r , Mark Brown , Rhyland Klein , David Woodhouse , Tony Lindgren , Russell King , Sebastian Reichel , "aaro.koskinen@iki.fi" , "freemangordon@abv.bg" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] power_supply: bq24261 charger driver Message-ID: <20140129132334.GB15355@jenny-desktop> References: <1390411194-21410-1-git-send-email-jenny.tc@intel.com> <1390411194-21410-5-git-send-email-jenny.tc@intel.com> <20140128141445.GC8713@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140128141445.GC8713@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 07:14:45AM -0700, Pavel Machek wrote: > > +#define BQ24261_ICHRG_MASK (0x1F << 3) > > +#define BQ24261_ICHRG_100ma (0x01 << 3) > > +#define BQ24261_ICHRG_200ma (0x01 << 4) > > +#define BQ24261_ICHRG_400ma (0x01 << 5) > > +#define BQ24261_ICHRG_800ma (0x01 << 6) > > +#define BQ24261_ICHRG_1600ma (0x01 << 7) > > First, its mA, not ma. Camel Case allowed? Ignore Checkpatch.pl warning? > > +u16 bq24261_iterm[][2] = { > > + {0, 0x00} > > + , > > + {50, BQ24261_ITERM_50ma} > > + , > > + {100, BQ24261_ITERM_100ma} > > + , > > + {150, BQ24261_ITERM_100ma | BQ24261_ITERM_50ma} > > ...this is very obscure way to do with table what can be done with > > (x/50) << 3, right ? Few register settings need table mapping, but some can have logic as your comment say. Just wanted to keep same logic for all register settings. Doesn't it make more readable? > > +u16 bq24261_cc[][2] = { > > + > > + {500, 0x00} > > + , > > + {600, BQ24261_ICHRG_100ma} > > + , > > + {700, BQ24261_ICHRG_200ma} > > + , > > + {800, BQ24261_ICHRG_100ma | BQ24261_ICHRG_200ma} > > + , > > + {900, BQ24261_ICHRG_400ma} > > I suspect you can get rid of this, too, if you expand macros. Same as above comment. -Jenny