From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 16:10:12 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v8 0/38] Switch over to real Kbuild In-Reply-To: <20140203124630.481C.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com> References: <1390998395-18567-1-git-send-email-yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> <20140203124630.481C.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com> Message-ID: <20140206211012.GI7049@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 12:46:30PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hello Simon and Tom, > > > This is my analysis of Kbuild performance. [snip] > Conclusion: > The main reasons of the slow down with Kbuild are "fixdep" and "arg-check". > Both of them are really important features for Kbuild and Kconfig. > - "fixdep" is mandatory for our better life with Kconfig. > - "arg-check" is for perfect dependency tracking. > > > > > > What's your plan about this series? > > > Are we ready to switch to Kbuild, or need more review? > > > > Lets get the performance problem Simon found figured out, but then > > otherwise, yes, I think we're about ready to merge. > > Tom, are you satisfied with my analisys? I am, yes. I guess if we're unhappy with the times, if we can improve them we can push that back to the kernel and that's a good thing. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: